Spirituality, Justice, and Humanism in Human Existence: the Digital Discourse of War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2026.812Keywords:
spirituality, justice, humanism, digital discourse, human existence, warAbstract
The article offers a comprehensive socio-philosophical analysis of the transformation of the discourse of spirituality, justice, and humanism in Ukraine under the influence of full-scale war and digitalization. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to understand how the fundamental values of human existence are being reinterpreted in the context of an existential crisis and "liquid modernity" (Z. Bauman), where traditional hierarchies give way to networked forms of communication, a defining feature of the information society. The research hypothesis is that war acts as a catalyst, shifting the discourse of spirituality, justice, and humanism from static hierarchical models to dynamic networked practices, where linguistic means, metaphorical models, and rhetorical strategies become key tools for constructing collective identity, legitimizing resistance, and forming an inclusive value space. The theoretical framework synthesizes Z. Bauman's concept of "liquid modernity," M. Castells' theory of the network society, J. Habermas' post-secular approach, and critical discourse analysis (N. Fairclough, T. van Dijk). The methodology combines secondary analysis of sociological data with discourse analysis of the digital content of Ukrainian denominations, as presented in authoritative media and scholarly research. The results reveal profound transformations: a shift from hierarchical to networked communication models, a reinterpretation of key values, the activation of metaphorical arsenals, and the emergence of inclusive linguistic strategies. Significant risks are identified: the digital divide, the tension between the universalism of humanism and the demonization of the enemy, and the threat of politicizing value discourse. The conclusions argue that the prospects for post-war development will depend on the ability of public institutions to develop inclusive dialogue strategies, preserving value pluralism in the conditions of the information society. The Ukrainian experience emerges as a representative model of the transformation of the discourse of fundamental values in the context of global instability.
Downloads
References
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2001). The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid Fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2011). Culture in a Liquid Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brik, T., & Metreveli, T. (2023a). Orthodox Churches during the pandemic in Ukraine and Georgia: narratives and new practices. Problems of Post-Communism. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2023.2166847
Brik, T., & Metreveli, T. (2023b). Shots of faith: the influence of Christian nationalism on vaccination behaviour in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, and Montenegro. In Ortho-dox Christianity and the Covid-19 Pandemic. Routledge.
Campbell, H. A. (Ed.). (2013). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London; New York: Routledge.
Campbell, H. A. (2024). Digital Religion in Times of War: Ukrainian Cases. Journal of Religion in Europe, 17(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-bja10125
Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Wiley-Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analy-sis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (2002). Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God and Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Time of Transitions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (2008). Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
KIIS. (2024). Religious self-identification of the population of Ukraine, attitudes towards the creation of a single Or-thodox Church and the Law on the prohibition of certain religious organizations. Retrieved from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1443&page=1
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Razumkov Centre. (2025). Ukrainian society, state and church during the war. Church and religious situation in Ukraine-2024 [Expert discussion]. Organized by the Razumkov Centre and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.kas.de/en/web/ukraine/veranstaltungsberichte/detail/-/content/ukrains-ke-suspil-stvo-derzava-i-cerkva-pid-cas-vijni-cerkovno-religijna-situacia-v-ukraini-2024-4
van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.
van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhytkova, O. (2025). Rosary Unites: Online Religious Rituals During the War in Ukraine. Journal of Religion in Europe, 18(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-bja10126
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ольга Добродум

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. This license allows others to distribute (copy) the published work for non-commercial purposes, provided there is mandatory attribution to its authors and a link to the first publication in our journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.