Consideration of responsibility with "morali equity" position
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2015.6(138).54635Keywords:
responsibility, equity, fairness, freedom, respect, personal dignityAbstract
The purpose of this article is to identify the nature and specificity of the one of moral responsibility angles namely responsibility as equity. Moral responsibility defined as intense contradiction between the tendency that is focused on the individual isolation feom integrity, and centripetal tendency which aims at unity with others. In the phenomena of fairness, duty, personal dignity the tendency of the responsibility exclusively for myself, and the responsibility for the other is a tribute to the fact that we exist in a socialized world clearly reflects. However, as an autonomous individual has a need to enter into social contacts, he is forced to take up humanity constituted norms and principles for determining the extent of certain actions, the common denominator of which is the justice category.
An understanding of the subject as the embodiment and individualized, but interacting with others, reflected in the concept of justice, which sets boundaries and makes possible the ontological foundation of responsibility. The justice sets limits of responsibility, not allowing it to turn into an all-out, because it is those minimum of restrictions not following of which makes the individual lose the status of the Human. It was found that the responsibility rational moment which is understood in terms of equity and obligation, does not deny the justice existence sense. Responsibility analysis due to the concepts of respect and personal dignity reveals those phenomenon distinctions that characterize self-determined, individualized person, who marked its expansion moral boundaries to the world and is able to recognize somebodies' originality and make him consider of its own and others autonomy. Responsibility, which is built on the basis of justice, outlines the boundaries that should not to be passed by the autonomous, moral, conscious entity.References
Anchel E. (1988), The ethos and history [translated], Mysl,Moscow, 126 p. (rus).
Alekseyeva T. A. (2001), Justice as a political concept: Outline of contemporary Western debate, MONF,Moscow, 242 p. (rus).
Bandzeladze G. D. (1979), On the concept of human dignity, Metsniereba,Tbilisi, 108 p. (rus).
Gogotishvili L. A., Gurevich P. S. [ed.] (1992), Bakhtin as a philosopher, Nauka, Moscow, 256 p. (rus).
Berbeshkina Z. A. (1983), Justice as a socio-philosophical category, Mysl,Moscow, 204 p. (rus).
Guseinov A. A. (1995), The moral demagoguery as a form of apology for violence, Voprosy filosofii [Moscow], № 5, pp. 5-12 (rus).
Guseinov A. A., Apresian R. G. (2007), Ethic, Hardaryka, Moscow, 470 p. (rus).
Yermolenko A. N. (1994), Ethics and social responsibility of human existence (the German modern practical philosophy), Naukova dumka, Kyiv, 200 p. (rus).
Zarayeva L. V. (2007), Some western theories of justice, Vlast [Moscow], № 8, pp. 67-70 (rus).
Carnashe H. Iu. (2006), Justice as a moral and political category, Hardaryka,Moscow, 305 p. (rus).
Drobnitskiy O. G. (2002), Moral Philosophy: Selected Works, Hardaryka,Moscow, 523 p. (rus).
Pirogov G. G. (2008), Social justice: the genesis of ideas, SOCIS [Moskow], № 9, pp. 3-11 (rus).
Prokofiev A. V. (2006), Fairness and Responsibility: social and ethical issues in moral philosophy,PublisherTulaStatePedagogicalUniversitynamed after L.N.Tolstoy,Tula, 278 p. (rus).
Rawls J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 607 p., available at: https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=vcVEPc30ut0C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false (engl).
Sytnichenko L. A. (2006), Libertyand justice in the era of globalization, Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac [Kyiv], № 57 (ukr).
Shevchenko A. K. (1991), Culture. History. Personality. Introduction to the philosophy of the act, Naukova dumka, Kyiv, 192 p. (rus).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Tetiana Zaporozhets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.