Freedom and Justice between Humanism and Posthumanism: Existential Cultural Aspects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2025.7414

Keywords:

freedom, justice, humanism, posthumanism, existential cultural aspects, social transformations, human

Abstract

The article analyzes the profound social transformations of the late 2010s–2020s triggered by the simultaneous action of several irreversible processes: the mass adoption of neural interfaces and genome editing, the total algorithmization of behavior management, the collapse of the anthropocentric climate model, and the transformation of platform capitalism into the dominant form of labor and exchange organization. These processes are destroying the foundation of the modern social contract, which was built on the figure of the sovereign, bodily bounded, rational individual as the sole legitimate bearer of rights, freedoms, and moral responsibility.
In a world where a significant portion of social decisions is made by opaque algorithms, consciousness can be distributed between the biological brain and cloud servers, and spe-cies boundaries become a matter of designer choice, the traditional categories of freedom and justice lose their regulatory power. Freedom - whether understood as negative protection of privacy or positive self-determination - ceases to function in a reality where the subject is originally distributed. Justice as equality among autonomous individuals and the fair distribu-tion of resources becomes meaningless when the social network includes actors lacking classical subjectivity (AI, genetically modified organisms, climatic hyperobjects) yet possessing real agency and vulnerability.
Justice is undergoing a transition from a distributive model to an ontological one: its task is no longer the distribution of goods among already-existing subjects but the maintenance of the viability of the entire expanded network, including future generations, algorithms, ecosystems, and the climate. Four dominant collective affects of the current social transformations have been identified: ontological anxiety over the loss of the human center, euphoria of mor-phological freedom, zoetic guilt toward the nonhuman, and the strange calm of flat ontology, when humanity ceases to be the measure of all things.
The research findings have direct practical relevance for understanding and managing on-going social transformations, creating a foundation for an affirmative politics of immanence capable of overcoming the dichotomy between reactionary bio-conservatism and uncritical techno-accelerationism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AI Safety Index. (2025). Winter 2025 AI Safety Index. Future of Life Institute. https://futureoflife.org/ai-safety-index-winter-2025/

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780¬822388128

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/-10.1215/9780822391623

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198739228.001.0001

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.

Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus (J. O'Brien, Trans.). Hamish Hamilton.

Dick, P. K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep?. Doubleday.

Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic.

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature (W. Rehg, M. Pensky, & H. Beister, Trans.). Polity Press.

Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twenti-eth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780

Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Harper.

Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury Academic.

International AI Safety Report. (2025). International AI Safety Report 2025. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-ai-safety-report-2025

Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809590

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Viking.

Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674728554

Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. Polity Press.

Mill, J. S. (2007). On liberty. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1859)

More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhu-manist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/97811¬18555927

Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/97808166-89224.001.0001

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1971) https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582

Roden, D. (2015). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. Routledge.

Sandel, M. J. (2007). The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI33471

Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Philosophical Library.

Sharon, T. (2018). When digital health meets digital capitalism: How new technologies are changing health, self-tracking. Big Data & Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718815469

Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism?. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816666140.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Dobrodum, O. (2025). Freedom and Justice between Humanism and Posthumanism: Existential Cultural Aspects. Skhid, 7(4), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2025.7414

Issue

Section

Cultural Heritage and Memory: Challenges of Preservation and Identity