Freedom and Justice between Humanism and Posthumanism: Existential Cultural Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2025.7414Keywords:
freedom, justice, humanism, posthumanism, existential cultural aspects, social transformations, humanAbstract
The article analyzes the profound social transformations of the late 2010s–2020s triggered by the simultaneous action of several irreversible processes: the mass adoption of neural interfaces and genome editing, the total algorithmization of behavior management, the collapse of the anthropocentric climate model, and the transformation of platform capitalism into the dominant form of labor and exchange organization. These processes are destroying the foundation of the modern social contract, which was built on the figure of the sovereign, bodily bounded, rational individual as the sole legitimate bearer of rights, freedoms, and moral responsibility.
In a world where a significant portion of social decisions is made by opaque algorithms, consciousness can be distributed between the biological brain and cloud servers, and spe-cies boundaries become a matter of designer choice, the traditional categories of freedom and justice lose their regulatory power. Freedom - whether understood as negative protection of privacy or positive self-determination - ceases to function in a reality where the subject is originally distributed. Justice as equality among autonomous individuals and the fair distribu-tion of resources becomes meaningless when the social network includes actors lacking classical subjectivity (AI, genetically modified organisms, climatic hyperobjects) yet possessing real agency and vulnerability.
Justice is undergoing a transition from a distributive model to an ontological one: its task is no longer the distribution of goods among already-existing subjects but the maintenance of the viability of the entire expanded network, including future generations, algorithms, ecosystems, and the climate. Four dominant collective affects of the current social transformations have been identified: ontological anxiety over the loss of the human center, euphoria of mor-phological freedom, zoetic guilt toward the nonhuman, and the strange calm of flat ontology, when humanity ceases to be the measure of all things.
The research findings have direct practical relevance for understanding and managing on-going social transformations, creating a foundation for an affirmative politics of immanence capable of overcoming the dichotomy between reactionary bio-conservatism and uncritical techno-accelerationism.
Downloads
References
AI Safety Index. (2025). Winter 2025 AI Safety Index. Future of Life Institute. https://futureoflife.org/ai-safety-index-winter-2025/
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780¬822388128
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/-10.1215/9780822391623
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198739228.001.0001
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.
Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus (J. O'Brien, Trans.). Hamish Hamilton.
Dick, P. K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep?. Doubleday.
Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature (W. Rehg, M. Pensky, & H. Beister, Trans.). Polity Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twenti-eth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780
Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Harper.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury Academic.
International AI Safety Report. (2025). International AI Safety Report 2025. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-ai-safety-report-2025
Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809590
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Viking.
Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674728554
Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. Polity Press.
Mill, J. S. (2007). On liberty. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1859)
More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhu-manist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/97811¬18555927
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/97808166-89224.001.0001
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1971) https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
Roden, D. (2015). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. Routledge.
Sandel, M. J. (2007). The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI33471
Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Philosophical Library.
Sharon, T. (2018). When digital health meets digital capitalism: How new technologies are changing health, self-tracking. Big Data & Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718815469
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism?. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816666140.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ольга Добродум

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. This license allows others to distribute (copy) the published work for non-commercial purposes, provided there is mandatory attribution to its authors and a link to the first publication in our journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.