The Ancient Era and the Problem of the 'Break of Epochs' in Viktor Petrov's Vision: the Discreteness of the Ukrainian Historical Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2025.739Keywords:
Viktor Petrov, Theory of Epochs, Antique epoch, Zarubyntsi and Chernyakhiv archaeological cultures, roman politics, romanization, antique societyAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the Theory of Epochs developed by the prominent Ukrainian thinker and scholar Viktor Petrov (V. Domontovych) and its verification based on the materials of ancient Ukrainian history, particularly the archaeological cultures of the Black Sea region and the Dnipro basin. Petrov’s theory offers a fundamentally different view of historical development, rejecting its linearity and evolutionism. Instead, it defines the historical process as discrete, emphasizing the isolation and self-sufficiency of individual epochs in the formation of the Ukrainian people. In this context, an epoch is understood as a structural, internally closed entity determined by a dominant ideology, a stable economic foundation, and established social institutions. Rather than continuing one another, epochs replace or oppose each other, thus forming the overall historical process through “breaks” – ruptures and crises. The Ancient Era represents one such crucial stage in Slavic and Ukrainian ethnogenesis (Ith century BCE – IV th century CE). The article examines the chronological boundaries and conceptual content of this period, which Petrov viewed as a “barbarian variant” of the Hellenistic civilization north of the Black Sea. In particular, the study defines the role of Roman influence, which, according to Petrov, was not decisive but merely contributed to individual Romanization. Meanwhile, the Zarubyntsi and Chernyakhiv cultures are interpreted as examples of local modifications of self-sufficient ancient cultures that already displayed signs of universalization. The paper also defines the nature of the “break” of the Ancient Era, which led to the disappearance of the Chernyakhiv culture around the middle of the first millennium CE. Petrov believed that this rupture was caused by the deep crisis of the Roman Empire in the second half of the IVth century and the collapse of the old-world system of connections, based on Rome’s supremacy among other peoples. The Hunnic invasion merely intensified the pre-existing crisis. The focus of the research is directed toward highlighting the connection between Ukrainian culture and European civilization as an equal and self-sufficient component whose roots reach back to Antiquity. Petrov’s concept, emphasizing discreteness, ruptures, and autonomous devel-opment, is presented within the context of XXth–early XXIth century historical and archaeo-logical thought as a novel and still scientifically relevant theory, confirmed by the works of modern researchers.
Downloads
References
Aheieva, V. (2006). Poetyka paradoksa: Intelektualna proza Viktora Petrova-Domontovycha. [The Poetics of Paradox: The intellectual prose of Viktor Petrov-Domontovych]. Kyiv, Fakt. (in Ukrainian).
Andrieiev, V. (2008). Ukrainskyi metanaratyv: neliniinist ta dyskretnist istorii [The Ukrainian Metanarrative: Non-linearity and Discreteness of History]. Eidos :almanakh teorii ta istorii istorychnoi nauky, 3, 140-152. (in Ukrainian).
Ber, V. (1946). Nash chas yak vin ye : z pryvodu statti Normana Kaznsa «The Saturday Review of Literature» [Our Time as It Is: Regarding Norman Cousins's Article "The Saturday Review of Literature"] Ridne slovo : visn. literatury, mystetstva i nauky, 8, 28-40. (in Ukrainian).
Domontovych, V. (1942) Bez gruntu [Without soil] Ukrain-skyi zasiv. X, 2, 30-57. (in Ukrainian).
Domontovych, V. (1943) Bez gruntu. Prodovzhennia [With-out soil. Continued] Ukrainskyi zasiv. X,4, 49-71. (in Ukrainian).
Fizer, I. (1999). Ukrainskyi Fuko chy frantsuzkyi Petrov? Raziucha skhozhist dvokh istoriosofiv [Ukrainian Foucault or French Petrov? The striking similarity of the two historiographers]. Naukovi zapysky. Filolohiia, 1, 42-44 (in Ukrainian).
Kravchenko, N. (1994). Cherniakhivske poselennia Obu-khiv ta yoho “kyivske” otochennia: do vyvchennia kha-rakteru zviazkiv mizh cherniakhivskoiu ta “tradytsi-inymy” kulturamy rymskoi doby [Chernyakhiv settle-ment of Obukhiv and its "Kyiv" surroundings: towards studying the nature of the connections between Chernyakhiv and "traditional" cultures of the Roman era] Starozhytnosti Rusi-Ukrainy. 1, 37-43. (in Ukrainian).
Kravchenko, N. (2001). Drevniaia ystoryia slavian v kontseptsyiakh sovremennoi ukraynskoi ystoryohrafyy. Dva metodolohycheskykh podkhoda [Ancient History of the Slavs in Concepts of Modern Ukrainian Historiog-raphy. Two Methodological Approaches]. Slavic cultures in European civilization: to the 60th anniversary of Dr. of History, Prof. Alekseev Yuri Nikolaevich, 1, 165–197 (in Russian)
Mishenina, N. (2002). Istoriosofskyi motyv zminy epokh yak model vnutrishnoho intertekstu (proza Viktora Petrova-Domontovycha) [The Historiosophical Motif of the Change of Epochs as a Model of Internal Intertext (The Prose of Viktor Petrov-Domontovych)] Slovo i chas, 11, 26-32 (in Ukrainian).
Mommsen, T. (2022). The provinces of the Roman Empire. Prague: DigiCat.
Motsia, O. (2011). Ukraintsi: narod i yoho zemlia (etapy stanovlennia) [Ukrainians: the people and their land (stages of formation)]. Kyiv: Starodavnii svit. (in Ukrain-ian).
Nechyporenko, V. (2021). Rymski viiskovi tabory na terytorii Pivnichnoho prychornomoria [Roman military camps in the territory of the northern Black sea]. Arkheolohich-ni doslidzhennia v Ukraini: zdobutky i perspektyvy Zbirnyk materialiv X Vseukrainskoi studentskoi ark-heolohichnoi konferentsii. 72 – 77 (in Ukrainian).
Pavlychko, S. (1999). Dyskurs modernizmu v ukrainskii literaturi [The discourse of modernism in Ukrainian literature]. Kyiv: Osnovy. (in Ukrainian).
Petrov, V. (1942). Hoty na Ukraini ta kultura poliv pokhovan [Goths in Ukraine and the culture of burial fields]. Ukrainskyi zasiv. – X. 1, 61-65. (in Ukrainian).
Petrov, V. (1946). Istoriosofichni etiudy [Historical-Social Studies]. MUR: zb. literaturno-mystetskoi problematyky, 2, 7-19. (in Ukrainian)
Petrov, V. (1965) Sloviany i Vizantiia. Pro zminu arkheolo-hichnykh kultur na terytorii Ukrainy v V-VII st. n. e. [Slavs and Byzantium. On the change of archaeological cultures on the territory of Ukraine in the 5th-7th centu-ries AD]. Arkheolohiia. Vol 18. 3 – 13. (in Ukrainian).
Petrov, V. (1972) Etnohenez slovian. Dzherela, stan rozvytku i problematyka [Ethnogenesis of the Slavs. Sources, state of development and problems]. Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka. (in Ukrainian).
Petrov, V. (1992). Pokhodzhennia ukrainskoho narodu [The origin of the Ukrainian people]. Kyiv: MP «Feniks» (in Ukrainian).
Tolochko, P. P. (ed.), Borovskyi, Ya. (ed.) Baran, V. (ed.) (2000). Davnia istoriia Ukrainy [Ancient history of Ukraine]. Kyiv: In-t arkheolohii NAN Ukrainy. Vol. 3: «Sloviano-ruska doba». (in Ukrainian).
Tsytseron M. T. (2020) Pro zakony. Pro derzhavu. Pro pryrodu bohiv.[The law, The republic, The origin of gods]. Lviv: Apriori. (in Ukrainian)
Zalizniak L. (2011) Ukraintsi: vytoky ta istorychni doli [Ukrainians: origins and historical destinies]. Kyiv: Tempora. (in Ukrainian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Аліса Лукашенко, Віталій Aндрєєв

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. This license allows others to distribute (copy) the published work for non-commercial purposes, provided there is mandatory attribution to its authors and a link to the first publication in our journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.