Tandem of Populism and Post-truth as the background of development of the modern democracy in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2019.3(161).171989

Keywords:

democracy, elections, populism, post-truth, mem

Abstract

Political science theories and concepts that describe the real political process have always been the empirical basis for political philosophy. According to the author, the 2019 Ukrainian presidential election campaign can best be understood and described using the concepts of “populism” and “post-truth”. The paper analyzes the discourse of the concept of “populism”, and reveals its content and main features. The need to establish social supervision over the actions of the authorities as a means of countering populism is emphasized. Essential characteristics of the post-truth phenomenon are revealed. The theoretical chain of the terms “verity” – “truth” – “post-truth” is presented. The meme as a unit of post-truth is analyzed. The paper proves that it was the bundle of populism and post-truth that had been the background of the electoral consciousness where the manipulative election technologies of the presidential campaign in Ukraine unfolded.

Author Biography

Vira Dodonova, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor

References

Fukuyama, Fransis (2019). Politychnyy poryadok i politychnyy zanepad. Vid promyslovoyi revolyutsiyi do hlobalazatsiyi demokratiyi (translat. from English). Kyiv: Nash format, 608 p. (In Ukrainian)

Abazi, H. (2017). On the background and the possible impact of epistemology on the emergence of the post of truth. Thesis No. 3, Retrieved from https://clck.ru/GpVvz (Accessed: 13.05.2018).

Kirkpatrick, A. (2017). Understanding in a post-truth world: comprehension and co-naissance as empathetic antidotes to post-truth politics. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy. Vol. 13, no. 3. P. 4-28. (In English)

Gellner, E. & Ionescu, G. (1969). Populism: It’s Meanings and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 347 p. (In English)

МacRae, D. (1969). Populism as an Ideology. Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. London, Pp. 347. (In English)

Herasina, L. M. and Pohribna, V. L. and Polishchuk, I. O. and other. Trebin. M. P. (ed.) (2015). Politolohichnyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk. Kharkiv: Pravo, 816 p. (In Ukrainian)

Dodonov, D. (2017). Fenomen populizmu v suchasnomu politychnomu prostori. Hileya: naukovyy visnyk (Kyiv). Issue 123 (8). Pp. 287-292. (In Ukrainian)

Dawkins, Richard (2006). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, USA; 3rd edition, April 24. Pp. 192. (In Ukrainian)

Bortnikov, N. A. and Pungina, A. P. (2017). Vizualnyy politicheskiy internet-mem kak instrument postpravdy. Politika postpravdy v sovremennom mire. St. Petersburg: Scythia-print, P.38-40. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Dodonova, V. (2019). Tandem of Populism and Post-truth as the background of development of the modern democracy in Ukraine. Skhid, (3(161), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2019.3(161).171989

Issue

Section

Political philosophy