National policy of Ukraine in culture in the evaluation intellectual elites and civil society experts (1999-2015)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2016.6(146).91766

Keywords:

Cultural policy, heritage, national memory, civil society

Abstract

Euromaidan and dignity revolution, which further continues, clearly show that without change in the national policy of culture change the country will be very difficult. It's tactics and strategy formation space of life for the citizens of Ukraine, information about Ukrainian and country in the world, formed throughout history and established in today's harmful and humiliating stereotypes, myths. Obviously the official state culture has long been not satisfied an active, creative part of society. Outside the official data analysis of cultural policy meet in publications, cultural in content, authored by writers, critics, scholars and public figures.

Balance cultural processes, that attitude to culture as an important tool strengthening state sovereignty on the political, spiritual, economic and other levels and other levels within Ukraine and abroad ensured civil society. They monitor cultural processes. Among the most notable, sharp and accurate assessments of cultural policy is advisable to allocate positions L. Kostenko, I. Dziuba, O. Zabuzhko, M. Riabchuk and other lesser-known experts. These persons is difficult to accuse of bias.

In the article was put goal disclose the relationship to the national cultural policy of the Ukrainian intelligentsia and civil society experts, that are recognized in Ukraine and the world.

Author Biography

Ivan Khoma, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Candidate of Historical Sciences, assistant professor of history of Ukraine and cross-cultural communication 

References

Kostenko, L. (2005), Humanitarian aura nation or defect of the primary mirror, Kyiv, 32 p. (ukr).

Dziuba, I. (2001),Ukrainebefore the Sphinx future, Kyiv, 35 p. (ukr).

Kostenko, L. (2005), Ukraine as a victim and a factor of globalization disasters, in Ivshynyia, L. (Ed.), Two Ruses, Ukrainian press-group, Kyiv, 496 p. (ukr).

Riabchuk, M. “In bed with an elephant” or colonial and postcolonial legacy inheritance, available at: http://gazeta.dt.ua/CULTURE/u_lizhku_zi_ slonom,_abo_kolonialna_spadschina_i_ postkolonialna_spadkovist.html (ukr).

Zabuzhko, O. (2005), On the verge of a humanitarian catastrophe cultural policy and state independence, Mirror of the week, 3 (December), № 47 (575) (ukr).

Rotovskyi, A., Shtepa, Yu. (2006), Ukrainian national idea: from weeping to a constructive dialogue. Why a national idea of Ukraine, Mirror of the week, 9 (September), № 34 (613) (ukr).

Okara, A. (2007), The cultural sovereignty of the nation in the period of post-modern or recode as «local» culture, Mirror of the week, 9 (September), № 34 (613) (ukr).

Zdioryk, O., Lytvynenko, O., Rozumna, O. (2012), Cultural Policy of Ukraine: national model in the European context, Kyiv, 69 p. (ukr).

Biletsky, V. (1997), NGOs and their role in society, Skhid, № 8, 16-20 (ukr).

Zabuzhko, O. (2015), Country without its history will not becomes a regional leader, available at: http://life.pravda.com.ua/culture/2015/12/12/204689/ (ukr).

Published

2017-02-02

How to Cite

Khoma, I. (2017). National policy of Ukraine in culture in the evaluation intellectual elites and civil society experts (1999-2015). Skhid, (6(146). https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2016.6(146).91766

Issue

Section

History