precariat, self-identification, work-based identity, money, self-branding


This article is devoted to the self-identification of precariat representatives. The study on the identity is relevant due to the fact that for precariat, which lives in total instability and uncertainty, such factor of stabilization is much more important than for other social groups. The purpose of the article is to delineate self-identification features of precariat representatives. A cross-methodological approach has been used to achieve this purpose, including: systemic, comparative methods; method of synthesis and generalization of materials presented in the scientific literature on the researched problem. The main defining characteristics of precariat have been disclosed, including the lack of the work-based and occupational identity. It is concluded that the lack of work-based and occupational identity makes it more difficult to form a class consciousness of precariat, which, in turn, impedes the establishment of precariat as a “class-for-itself”. Nowadays, the formation of identity is often replaced with self-branding. Self-branding, however, does not contribute to the formation of stable self-identification that may be helpful in stabilization of social positions and removal of instability and uncertainty. It often leads to replacing people with things they buy and money they earn instead of identification with certain profession. The formation of precariat representatives’ self-identification is important to remove the uncertainty and instability, thus, to solve the problems of anxiety inherent in precariat. The studies on this problem can influence the economic and political spheres. The following studies on self-identification of precariat representatives in Ukraine is also relevant because it can help to understand the specificity of this class and its manifestations in our country.

Author Biographies

Ivan Oliynyk, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Postgraduate Student

Tatiana Bezprozvanna, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Postgraduate Student


Banki, S. (2013). Precarity of place: A complement to the growing precariat literature. Global Discourse, 3(3), 450-463. DOI:

Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaya sovremennost: per. s angl. pod red. Yu. V. Asochakova. SPb.: Piter, 240 s. (In Russian)

Biriukov, A.A. (2015). Emergence of Precariat or Return of Proletariat? (Analysing “The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class” by G. Standing). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No 10, 158-162

Bothma, F., & Roodt, G. (2012). Work-based identity and work engagement as potential antecedents of task performance and turnover intention: Unravelling a complex relationship. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(1). 17 p. DOI:

Chu, S. L., Schlegel, R., Quek, F., Christy, A., & Chen, K. (2017). ‘I Make, Therefore I Am’: The Effects of Curriculum-Aligned Making on Children’s Self-Identity. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 109-120. DOI:

Duffy, B. E., & Pooley, J. (2019). Idols of Promotion: The Triumph of Self-Branding in an Age of Precarity. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 26-48. DOI:

Erickson, E. (1996). Identichnost: yunost i krizis: Per. s angl. / Obshch. red. i predisl. Tolstykh A. V. M.: Izdatelskaya gruppa «Progress», 344 s. (In Russian)

Fearon, J. D. (1999). What Is Identity (As We Now Use the Word)? California: Stanford University. Retrieved from

Gasiukova, E., & Shkaratan, O. (2019). Precarity: The Significance of a Controversial Concept. Filosofija. Sociologija, 30(2), 116-125. DOI:

Gritsanov, A. A. (2003). Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar. 3-e izd., ispravl. Mn.: Knizhnyy Dom,1280 s. (In Russian)

Jenkins, R. (2004). Social Identity. London: Routledge. DOI:

Jönsson, D. (2012). The contained. Eurozine. Retrieved from:

Kasap, J. (2016). The Influence of Legal and Economic Conditions on the Appearance of the Institute of Precarium in Modern Regulation of Civil-Law. Economic and Social Development (Book of Proceedings), 16th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – “Legal Challenges of Modern World”. Croatia: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency, Varazdin, 84-96.

Lazar, S., & Sanchez, A. (2019). Understanding labour politics in an age of precarity. Dialectical Anthropology, 43(1), 3-14. DOI:

Piercy, G. L. (2018). Baristas: The artisan precariat (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.han¬

Schierup, C.-U., & Jørgensen, M. B. (2016). An Introduction to the Special Issue. Politics of Precarity: Migrant Conditions, Struggles and Experiences. Critical Sociology, 42(7-8), 947-958. DOI:

Sitkevich, N. V. (2011). Problema identifikatsii cheloveka v informatsionnom obshchestve skvoz prizmu mirovozzrencheskikh izmeneniy. M: Gramota, 2011. № 3 (9): v 3-kh ch. Ch. III. C. 149-151. (In Russian)

Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academics. 198 p.

Standing, G. (2014). A Precariat Charter: From denizens to citizens. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved from

Walsh, K., & Gordon, J. R. (2008). Creating an individual work identity. Human Resource Management Review, 18(1), 46-61. DOI:

Whitmer, J. M. (2019). You are your brand: Self‐branding and the marketization of self. Sociology Compass. 2019; 13:e12662. DOI:




How to Cite

Oliynyk, I., Bezprozvanna, T., & Maletska, M. (2020). SELF-IDENTIFICATION OF PRECARIAT REPRESENTATIVES. Skhid, (5(169), 24–28.



Social Philosophy