Violence and Freedom: A Phenomenological Inquiry into the Practices of Freedom

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.636

Keywords:

Freedom, Phenomenology, Postcolonial Theory, Postmodernism, Violence

Abstract

 It’s difficult to give an account of human history without alluding to the reigns of terror and the fascination with violence perpetrated in the name of freedom and justice. Freedom and violence are two contrasting concepts that have shaped the history of humanity. While freedom is often associated with liberation, violence is characterized by the use of force and coercion. This study delves into the complex relationship between violence and freedom from a phenomenological perspective.

Our understanding of freedom is shaped by the Kantian conception of freedom as the property of the will. It’s a model of freedom which associates freedom with mastery. It’s not only the negative and positive conceptions of freedom that have fallen prey to this attitude but postmodern freedom also operates within the same framework. The paper challenges this conventional understanding of freedom and its alignment with violence by drawing on phenomenological philosophy to explore the experiences of individuals who are both subject and objects of violence. It argues that freedom is not simply the absence of physical constraints, but rather a complex interplay of social and existential factors that shape individuals' experiences of agency and autonomy.

References

Arendt, Hannah (1958). The Human Condition (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Arendt, Hannah (1961). Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. The Viking Press, New York.

Arendt, Hannah (1965). On Revolution. Penguin Books, London.

Berlin, Isaiah (1990). The Crooked Timber of Humanity. John Murray Publishers Ltd.

Berlin, Isaiah (1997). The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays. Chatto & Windus, London.

Carey, D. and Festa, L. (2009). Postcolonial Enlighten-ment: Eighteenth- century Colonialism and Postcolo-nial Theory. Oxford University Press.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

D'Entreves, M.Passerin and Benhabib, Seyla. (1997). Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Mo-dernity, MIT Press.

Dodd, James (2009). Violence and Phenomenology. Taylor and Francis Group, New York.

Eagleton, Terry (1996). The Illusions of Modernity. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Eze, C. Emmanuel (1997). Postcolonial African Philoso-phy: A Critical Reader. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Hicks, R.C. Stephen (2004). Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Fou-cault, Library of Congress.

Karademir, Aret (2013). Heidegger and Foucault: On the Relation between the “Anxiety-Engendering-Truth” and “Being-Towards-Freedom”. Human Studies, 36(3), 375 - 392.

Oksala, Johanna (2005). Foucault on Freedom. Cam-bridge University Press.

Rorty, Richard (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.

Sen, Somdeep (2013). Decolonizing Palestine: Hamas Between the Anticolonial and the Postcolonial. Cor-nell University Press, Ithaca.

Thiele, P. Leslie (1994). Heidegger on Freedom: Political not Metaphysical. American Political Science Asso-ciation

Zahar, Renate (1974). Frantz Fanon: Colonialism and Alienation. Monthly Review Press, New York.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Bekele, A. (2024). Violence and Freedom: A Phenomenological Inquiry into the Practices of Freedom. Skhid, 6(3), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.636

Issue

Section

Civilizational challenges: historical and philosophical parallels and modern interpretations