Transit of Hindu Mythology: Role of Biographical Method in Multicultural Landscape

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.638

Keywords:

culture, memory, multiculturalism, values, philosophical turn, being, biography, biographical approach, identity, identification, mythology

Abstract

The study offers a biographical examination of the “Ramayana,” an ancient Indian epic renowned not only for its cultural significance and literary eminence but also for its scrutiny within the framework of modern philosophical discourse that includes a biographical dimension. In the “Ramayana,” we trace how conventional cultural archetypes, such as devotion, justice, and love, are revealed through distinct biographical circumstances and narratives. In the epic, each character serves as a bearer of specific archetypal attributes and concepts, which reflect diverse facets of human nature and are also distinct symbols embodying virtues, devotion, love, morality, evil, etc. With the help of mythological plots through biographical practices, people identify themselves with the characters of myths. In recent decades, there has been a popularization of modern adaptations of the “Ramayana” across India. The emergence of “new Indian mythmaking” and the renewed perception of profound archetypes within Indian culture coincides with the growing expansion of biographical and pseudo-biographical content in mass media. The protagonists of epics serve as foundational elements for the biographical strategies embraced by modern audiences, playing an integral role in shaping the culture of modern India and determining specific options for constructing a life course. In this article, we have examined contemporary interpretations of the “Ramayana” by writers such as Kavita Kané, Amish Tripathi, and Devdutt Pattanaik. In the works of these authors, one observes a transformation in the biographies of characters, shifts in their conduct, and even depictions of their emotional states, all of which reflect modern socio-cultural realities. This philosophical turn, characterized by the fusion of ancient myths with modern realities, values, and reader expectations, leads to a rethinking of traditional images, as well as a cultural dialogue between the East and the West.

References

Atamaniuk, Z. (2023). Dukhovnist osobystosti yak proiav kulturnoho rozvytku [The Spirituality of the Individual as a Manifestation Cultural Development]. Naukove piznan-nia: metodolohiia ta tekhnolohiia, 1(51), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.24195/sk1561-1264/2023-1-5 (In Ukrainian)

Author Amish. (2015). The “Scion of Ikshvaku” Trailer by Amish [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/k4xhu9MeI-zw?si=qudin7TfBjkE6OG

Brodetska, Yu. (2022). Metodolohichni metamorfozy suchasnoi filosofii: «nova ontolohiia» buttia [Methodo-logical metamorphosis of Modern Philosophy: a «New Ontology» of Being]. Filosofiia ta politolohiia v konteksti suchasnoi kultury, Vol. 14, 1(29), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.15421/352201 (In Ukrainian)

Golubovych, I., Menzhulin, V. & Popova, T. (2021). Bi-ohrafistyka [Biographistics]. In Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia. https://vue.gov.ua/Біографістика (In Ukrainian)

Golubovych, I. & Menzhulin, V. (2021). Biohrafichnyi me¬tod [Biographical method]. In Velyka ukrainska entsy¬klopediia. https://vue.gov.ua/Біографічний_метод (In Ukrainian)

Golubovych, I. (2022). Fenomen biohrafii v kulturi: inteh-ratsiia doslidnytskykh stratehii [The phenomenon of bi-ography in culture: integration of previous strategies]. In S. P. Shevtsov (Ed.) Protsesy intehratsii i dyferentsiatsii v suchasnomu naukovomu ta filosofskomu znanni: kolekt. monohrafiia (pp. 213–233). Odeskyi natsionalnyi univer-sytet imeni I. I. Mechnykova. https://dspace.onu.edu.ua/items/119f244f-90de-49a6-911f-2fe24eee34eb (In Ukrainian)

Gotynyan-Zhuravlova, V. (2022). Multykulturalizm yak kliu-chovyi parametranalizu sotsialnykh I kultur-nykhiavyshch i protsesiv [Multiculturalism as a Key Pa-rameter of the Analysis of Social and Cultural Phenome-na and Processes]. Doksa. 2(38). 76–84. https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2022.2(38).¬283064 (In Ukrainian)

Eliade, M. (1954). Cosmos and History: The Myth of The Eternal Return. Harper & Brothers.

Kané, K. (2016) Lanka’s Princess. Rupa Publications.

Kané, K. (2014). Sita’s Sister. Rupa Publications. Kotak Mahindra partners with author Amish Tripathi (2015). Hans India. https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Hans/2015-06-30/Kotak-Mahindra-partners-with-author-Amish-Tripathi/160564

Levchenko, V. (2022). Muzeinist u systemy pochuttiv kultur-noi pamiati [Musealization in the System of Senses of Cultural Memory]. Doksa. 1(37). 138–142. https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2022.1(37).¬281828 (In Ukrainian)

Pattanaik, D. (2017) Leader: 50 Insights from Mythology. Harper Business.

Sharma, M. (2023). 108 Names of Lord Shri Ram with Mean-ing. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/religion/mantras-chants/108-names-of-lord-shri-ram-with-meaning/articleshow/106011858.cms

The Ramayana of Valmiki. Vol. 1 (1952). (Hari Prasad Shas-tri, Trans.). Burleigh Press.

The Ramayana of Valmiki. Vol. 2 (1957). (Hari Prasad Shas-tri, Trans.). Burleigh Press.

The Ramayana of Valmiki. Vol. 3 (1959). (Hari Prasad Shas-tri, Trans.). Burleigh Press.

Tripathi, A. (2022). Ram: Scion of Ikshvaku. HarperCollins India.

van der Veer, P. (1989). The Power of Detachment: Disci-plines of Body and Mind in the Ramanandi Order. American Ethnologist, 16(3), 458–470. http://www.jstor.org/stable/645268

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Ryzhik , M. ., & Golubovych , I. (2024). Transit of Hindu Mythology: Role of Biographical Method in Multicultural Landscape. Skhid, 6(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.638

Issue

Section

Civilizational challenges: historical and philosophical parallels and modern interpretations