Spatial Turn and Situational Approach: Ethical Dimension

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2023.4(1).277026

Keywords:

Spatial turn, situational approach, situation, ethos, individualization, spatialization, temporalization, a priori scene, limit-boundary situation, situational reason

Abstract

The article is devoted to the explanation of the basic principles of the situational approach in the light of the modern "spatial turn", presented to the scientific community by the ideas of such world-famous modern theorists as D. Harvey and A. Lefebvre. Our main focus is the ethical dimension of the outlined problem field. The starting point is the ancient presumption of the etymological and semantic unity of ethos and space. The authors of the article conceptualize this synthetic unity, offer a set of certain principles and theoretical assumptions. The main result of the study is the interpretation of the situation as a space of a responsible individual act, a field of equal interaction of the individual with the external environment, circumstances, conditions, as well as a state of existence of a “specific material a priori/ a priori scene”. The authors formulate the following principles of situational vision: a) the primacy of the individual, the existential situation and the secondary nature of any external circumstances and conditions; b) the principle of “primary historicity”; c) the principle of “limit situation” as a transcendental-immanent unity; d) the principle of the situation as a mode of “a priori scene”. The most important constitutive procedures of the situation as a topos of the act of individuation are described: interiorization and immanentization, namely, situational and personal interiorization of the meaning of the main civilizational cultural-historical conflicts and immanentization of general ethical norms in one's own individual semantic field. The thesis is substantiated that the spatial-situational discourse has significant heuristic resources for the analysis of current socio-cultural and political processes in the modern world.

References

Alekseeva, K. (2011). Poniattia sytuatsii u filosofskii antropolohii. Autoref. dis... cand. of philos. sciences. 09.00.04 – philosophical anthropology, philosophy of culture. Kyiv, T. Shevchenko Kyiv National University.

Artemenko, A. (2013). Topolohiia Ya v merezhevykh strukturakh sotsiumu. Kharkiv, Digital printing house No. 1. (In Ukrainian).

Bakntin, M.(1993). Towards to a Philosophy of the Act/ Translation&notice by V. Liapynov. Edited by V. Liapynov and M. Holquist. Texas: University of Texas Press Slavic Series.

Cassin, B.& Crepon, M. & Prost, F. (2011). Moral/Etyka. Yevropeiskyi slovnyk filosofii. Leksykon neperekladnostei. Volume 2. Edit. B. Cassin. Kyiv: Dukh – i – Litera, 372-383 (In Ukrainian).

Cassin, Barbara (comp., ed.) (2004). Vocabulaire européen des philosophies : dictionnaire des intraduisibles, Paris, Le Seuil/Le Rober. https://www.scribd.com/document/468679632/1-Barbara-Cassin-Vocabulaire-europe-en-des-philosophies-Dictionnaire-des-intraduisibles-0-Le-Robert-Seuil-libgen-lc-pdf

Epstein, M. (2010). From the Golden Rule to the Diamond Rule. An Introduction to Stereo Ethics. Proceeding of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy (2008). Vol. 10: Korean Philosophical Association, 77-89.

Golubovych, I. (2009). Biohrafiia yak sotsiokulturnyi fenomen (filosofsko-metodolohichnyi analiz). Autoref. thesis... doctor philos. sciences: 09.00.03 – social philosophy and philosophy of history. Odesa: Odesa I. I. Mechnikov University. (In Ukarainian)

Golubovych, I. (1997). Metodolohichni problemy sytuatsiinoho pidkhodu ta yoho zastosuvannia v suchasnykh humanitarnykh doslidzhenniakh: Autoref. thesis... cand. philos. sciences: 09.00.03 – social philosophy and philosophy of history. Odesa, K. D. Ushinskyi South Ukrainian Pedagogical University (In Ukarainian)

Harvey, D. (2006). Space as a Key Word. In: N. Castree, D. Gregory (eds.) David Harvey: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 263-270.

Jaspers, Karl (1953). The Origin and Goal of History [translated by M. Bullok]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Kolinko, M. (2019). Mizhkulturna komunikatsiya: topolohichnyy vymir. Vinnytsya, TVORY Ltd. (In Ukrainian)

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford:Blackwell.

Loy, A. (2006). Sytuatsiia rozumu ta "sytuiovanyi rozum". Filosofska dumka, 3, 26-45 (In Ukrainian).

Philosophy and the Public (2022, September,12-15). Program of the conference, Humboldt University Berlin, September 12-15, 2022. https://gap11.de/en/-programme.html#KU

Podpora, A. (2011). Spatial Turn in Literary Research, Analysis and Reading Practices: Perspectives and Limitation. Topos:”Spatial Turn” in Contemporary Social Sciences and Humanities. Vilnius, 1, 81-91.

Popper, Karl R. (1957). The poverty of historicism. Boston, Beacon Press.

Prepotenska, M. (2014). Homo Urbanus: fenomen liudyny mehapolisu. Dnipropetrovsk, T. K. Serednyak Publischer. (In Ukrainian).

Rentsch, Thomas (2010). Konstytutsiia moralnosti. Transtsendentalna antropolohiia i praktychna fylosofyia [transl. from German V. Prykhodko]. Kyiv, Dukh-i-Litera. (In Ukrainian).

Shramko, Y., Khomenko, I. (2022). Modern analytic philosophy: historical origins and prospects of development. (Based on the materials of the 11th International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, September 12-15, 2022, Berlin, Germany). Sententiae, v. 41, 197-205 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.03.197

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Golubovych, I., & Pavlenko , K. . (2023). Spatial Turn and Situational Approach: Ethical Dimension. Skhid, 4(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2023.4(1).277026