Communication: topology of metadiscourse of social interactions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2023.4(1).276457

Keywords:

communication, discourse, topology, intercommunication, dialogue, social interaction

Abstract

The article focuses on the definition and analysis of communication as a metadiscourse of social interactions in terms of the topological methodology. Socio-cultural transformations that shape the model of the global world and change the Ukrainian landscape, the intensification of cross-cultural contacts, international relations, relations of social communities on different levels actualize the problem of communicative interaction. Globalization processes, which involve representatives of different cultures in the general development of civilization, the challenges of military conflicts, in particular the war of Ukrainian people against the Russian invasion, require an adequately constructed discourse. In such contexts, the concept of communication as a metadiscourse, that is, a discourse about the discourses of social interactions, acquires a new meaning.

References

Boichenko, M. I. (2018). Komunikatyvna paradyhma doslidzhennya kultury. Ukrayinski kulturolohichni studiyi, 1 (2), 5–9. http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/-host/viking/db/ftp/univ/uks/uks_2018_02.pdf (In Ukrainian)

Hnatyuk, Olya (2005). Proshchannya z imperiyeyu: Ukrayinski dyskusiyi pro identychnist. Kyiv, Krytyka. (In Ukrainian)

Domnich, S. P. (2015). Sotsiokulturna komunikatsiya: filosofsko-antropolohichnyy analiz movlennyevykh praktyk u mizhkulurniy vzayemodiyi [avtoref. kand. filos. nauk. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University]. KhNU repository http://www-center.univer.kharkov.ua/ru/refer/avtoreferat_-domnich.pdf . (In Ukrainian)

Yermolenko, A. M. (1999). Komunikatyvna praktychna filosofiya. Kyiv, Libra, 1999. (In Ukrainian)

Yermolenko, A. (2022). Etyka dyskursu Karla-Otto Apelya yak «persha filosofiya» tretoyi paradyhmy: 100-richchya vid dnya narodzhennya Karla-Otto Apelya. Filosofska dumka, 2, 23–38. https://doi.org/-10.15407/fd2022.02.023. (In Ukrainian)

Kolinko, M. V. (2019a). Dyskurs-analiz u doslidzhenni mizhkulturnoyi komunikatsiyi. Hileya: Naukovyy Visnyk, 141 2), ch. 2. Filosofski nauky, 69–72. http://gileya.org/index.php?ng=library&cont=long&id=178 (In Ukrainian)

Kolinko, M. (2019b). Mizhkulturna komunikatsiya: vid rozriznennya do vklyuchennya. Mizhkulturna komunikatsiya. Vol 6 (1), 189–212. (In Ukrainian)

Kolinko, M. V. (2019c). Mizhkulturna komunikatsiya: topolohichnyy vymir. Vinnytsya, TVORY. (In Ukraini-an)

Kolinko, M.V. (2018). Topos yak ponyattya sotsialnoyi topolohiyi. Multyversum. Filosofskyy almanakh, 3–4 (165–166), 32–44. (In Ukrainian)

Palahuta, V. Y. (2010). Samoidentyfikatsiya sotsialnogo subjekta v diskursivnykh prostranstvakh. Dneprope-trovsk, Innovatsiya. (In Russian)

Blommaert, J. (2011). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Сommunication. Сambridge dictionary. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/communication.

Communication. Oxford Learner`s Dictionaries. URL: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/communication.

Foucault, М. (2002) Archeology of knowledge. London and New York, Routledge.

Kolinko, M., Petryshyn, H. (2022). Simulacra and fakes in the information warfare. Skhid, 3 (3), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2022.3(3).266049

Yereskova T., Mazuryk O., Aleksandrova O., Tymofieieva H., Zavadskyi V. (2020) Uncertainty as a regular feature of modern ukrainian society. Teorija in Praksa. 3, 928-946.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Kolinko, M., Petryshyn , H. ., & Chumak , H. . (2023). Communication: topology of metadiscourse of social interactions. Skhid, 4(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.21847/2411-3093.2023.4(1).276457