The problem of human dignity in its theological connotations under the conditions of the war of the russia against Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2022.3(4).269028Keywords:
human dignity, liberal theology, illiberal theology, freedom, personal autonomyAbstract
The author draws attention to the problem of human dignity as the basis of civilizational coexistence of subjects of different religious and secular beliefs. It is shown that neither international legal documents nor theological concepts provide a clear definition of the term “dignity”. Different readings refer to the meaningful, structural, dynamic meaning of this term. Based on the religious principles of tolerance, non-involvement and objectivity, this article examines human dignity in its theological connotations in view of the challenges of modern Ukrainian realities. The current positions of religious organizations, which traditionally enjoy the considerable trust of Ukrainian society, are articulated. Based on the generalization of the theoretical material and the statements of religious leaders of various denominations, the author concludes that in the conditions of the impossibility of political dialogue in the context of reconciliation with the aggressor, the idea of interreligious dialogue also needs urgent reconstruction, in particular, in particular, a direct answer to the question of whether dialogue can be the mission of the Church, conducted by it at the cost of truth and, at the same time, indulging human dignity, is needed.
References
Davis, J. Charles. (2015). Human Dignity as the Basis for Dialogue Between Religions. Jnanadeepa: Pune Journal of Religius Studies. July-Dec (15/2), 134-168. https://doi.org/-10.5281/zenodo.4295701
For the Life of the World. Toward a Social Ethos of the Orthodox Church. (2020). Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. https://clck.ru/32mbjN
Fylypovych, L. O. (ed.) & Horkusha, O. V. (ed.) (2015). Maydan i Tserkva. Khronika podiy ta ekspertna otsinka. Kyiv (In Ukrainian)
Hegel, G.V.F. (1971). Estetika. Vol.4. (In Russian)
Kulahina-Stadnichenko, Hanna (2019). Relihiynyy svitohlyad pravoslavnoho viruyuchoho v protsesakh protydiyi formuvannyu ukrayinsʹkoyi relihiynoyi identychnosti (pp. 156 – 163). In: A. Kolodnyi (ed.) Relihiyna bezpeka/nebezpeka Ukrayiny. Kyiv, UAR (In Ukrainian)
Kulahina-Stadnichenko, Hanna (2022). Ponyattya shchastya ta svyatosti u khrystyyanskiy tradytsiyi: relihiyeznavchyy dyskurs (p. 121-125). Conference Papers: “Shchastya ta suchasne suspilʹstvo”. Lviv, SPOLOM. https://doi.org/10.31108/7.2022.23 (In Ukrainian)
Lange, N. (2008). Christliche Kirchen der Ukraine übernehmen Verantwortung für die Entwicklung der Zivilgesellschaft. – Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. https://www.kas.de/uk/web/-ukraine/veranstaltungsberichte/detail/-/content/christliche-kirchen-der-ukraine-uebernehmen-verantwortung-fuer-die-entwicklung-der-zivilgesellschaft (In Deutsch. Im Ukrainian)
Loughlin, J. (2016). Human Dignity: the Foundation of Human Rights and Religious Freedom. Memoria y Civilización, 19, 313–343. https://doi.org/10.15581/001.19.313-343
Moroz, V. (2015). Ponyattya lyudskoyi hidnosti yak osnova sotsialnoyi pozytsiyi UHKTS: istoryko-relihiyeznavchyy analiz. In: Ukrayinska hreko-katolytsʹka tserkva v konteksti vitchyznyanoyi istoriyi ta suspilʹnykh transformatsiy: Conference Paper, 208-2014 https://tinyurl.com/5ce9ef2b
Ohiyenko, I. (translat.) (1962). Bibliya. Ob'yavlennya: 3: 15-16 https://boll.life/UBIO/66/3/ (In Ukrainian)
Osnovy vchennya Ruskoyi Pravoslavnoyi Tserkvy pro hidnist, svobodu i prava lyudyny (2009). Kyiv, Vydavnychyy viddil Ukrayinskoyi Pravoslavnoyi Tserkvy, 32 p. (In Ukrainian)
Papanikolaou, Aristotle (2021). Mistychne yak politychne. Demokratiya i neradykalna ortodoksiya. (Translat. from Engl.). Kyiv, Dukh i litera (In Ukrainian).
Vorster, Nico (2010). The relationship between human and non-human dignity. Scriptura, 104, 406-417 https://doi.org/10.7833/104-0-180
Yarotsky, P. L. (2013), Relihiyeznavstvo. K, Kondor (In Ukrainian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ганна Кулагіна-Стадніченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.