INTERPRETATIONS OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL LEGACY OF VOLODYMYR SHYNKARUK IN THE WORKS OF VITALII TABACHKOVSKYI

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2021.1(1(2)).237368

Keywords:

history of philosophy in Ukraine, modern Ukrainian philosophy, philosophy of Volodymyr Shynkaruk, Kyiv anthropological school

Abstract

The emergence of various interpretations of the legacy of Volodymyr Shynkaruk is caused not only by the texts of the classic of modern Ukrainian philosopher and facts from the histo-ry of philosophical thought development in Ukraine in the second half of the 20th century, but also by the struggle of various narratives that already exist or are offered by philosophers to tell about the fate of philosophy in Kyiv in Soviet and post-Soviet times. The discussion about the identity of Volodymyr Shynkaruk's philosophy arose in the late 1990s and early 2000s in connection with the publication by V.H. Tabachkovskyi of a number of articles and chapters in books devoted to the interpretation of the figure of V. Shynkaruk as the founder of the Kyiv anthropological school. Vitalii Tabachkovskyi tried to substantiate and reveal a cer-tain narrative about the Kyiv Philosophical School as the central mainstream in the philo-sophical sixties, as well as a narrative about the phenomenon of philosophical sixties as a kind of manifestation of liberalism and dissidence regarding the official ideology and philos-ophy. Many distortions of the true meaning of the texts of Kyiv philosophers occurred through reading them not in their own context and meanings, but through guessing what similar philosophical concepts are in world thought. Vitalii Tabachkovskyi's method of anal-ogies and his attempts to look at Volodymyr Shynkaruk's work through the prism of analo-gies with modern trends develop in his book and many articles. Despite the desire to posi-tively accept Vitalii Tabachkovskyi's reasoning about Volodymyr Shynkaruk's philosophical views, we cannot do this, as his reflections at certain points obviously contradict Volodymyr Shynkaruk's texts.

References

Khoma, O. (2004). Post-totalitarian philosophizing. Critique. 3 (77): 18-20 (in Ukrainian).

Kopnin, P.V., Popovich, M.V. (1965). Logic of scientific re-search. Moscow: Nauka (In Russian).

Krymskyi, S. (2012). Our life-long talk. (A cycle of interviews with T.A. Chaika). Kyiv: Dmitry Burago Publishing House (In Russian).

Lisovyi, V. (2004). Rhetoric instead of argumentation. Cri-tique. 3 (77): 17–18 (in Ukrainian).

Ponomarev, V. (2003). Designing a School. Critique. 12 (74): 28 (in Ukrainian).

Ponomarev, V. (2004). Stumps from the Academy Garden. Critique. 4 (78): 28 (in Ukrainian).

Popovich, M. (1997). P. V. Kopnin: man and philosopher. https://libr.link/uchebniki-istoriya-filosofii/popovich-pvkopnin-chelovek-31726.html (In Russian).

Shinkaruk, V. (2003) Selected works: in 3 volumes. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Spiritual Culture (in Ukraini-an).

Shinkaruk, V. (2003a) Selected works: in 3 volumes. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Spiritual Culture (in Ukraini-an).

Shinkaruk, V. (2004). Selected works: in 3 volumes. Vol. 3. Part 1. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Spiritual Culture, 2004. Vol. 3. Part 1 (in Ukrainian).

Shinkaruk, V. (2004a). Selected works: in 3 volumes. Vol. 3. Part 2. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Spiritual Culture, 2004 (in Ukrainian).

Tabachkovskyi, V. (2002). In search of unlost time: essays on the creative legacy of Ukrainian philosophers of the sixties. Kyiv: Parapan (in Ukrainian).

Tabachkovskyi, V. (2004). Ukrainian personalism of V. Shinkaruk in Shinkaruk V.I. Selected works: in 3 volumes. Vol. 3, Part. 1. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Spiritual Cul-ture, P. 5–55 (in Ukrainian).

Tabachkovskyi, V. (2003). Hegel's conceptual landscapes and domestic neo-Marxist phenomenology in Shinka-ruk V.I. Selected works: in 3 volumes. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Ukrain-ian Center for Spiritual Culture, 2004. P. 5-25 (in Ukraini-an).

Verloka, V. (2003). In the shadow of flower philosophers. Critique. 10 (72): 17–18 (in Ukrainian).

Verloka, V. (2004). Anthropology of anthropology. Critique. 3 (77): 15 (in Ukrainian).

Yaroshovets, V. (2010). Philosophy as a history of philosophy. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature (in Ukrainian).

Yemets-Dobronosova, J. (2003). Search for anthropology. Critique. 10 (72): 19-22 (in Ukrainian).

Downloads

Published

2021-07-01

How to Cite

VOVK, A. . (2021). INTERPRETATIONS OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL LEGACY OF VOLODYMYR SHYNKARUK IN THE WORKS OF VITALII TABACHKOVSKYI. Skhid, 1(1(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2021.1(1(2)).237368

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles