ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OVER THE ACTIVITIES OF THE CITY SELF-GOVERNMENTS OF THE EKATERINOSLAV PROVINCE (1870 – 1913)
part 1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2021.2(1).229423Keywords:
Ekaterinoslav Province, city public administration, self-government, provincial presence for the zemstvo and city affairs, Senate, City Duma, city council, social transformationsAbstract
It has been stated that in the practice of the Ekaterinoslav provincial presence for the zemstvo and city affairs, there are cases of detection of significant violations in the activities of public administrations of cities. The result was the initiation of criminal cases or the imposition of or disciplinary action against employees and even heads of communal institutions. There were also cases of unjustified prosecution of municipalities, which was accompanied by many years of litigation. It has been determined that the Governor, the Provincial Presence, the Senate in their control and appeal practice sought to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of individuals and urban communities. According to the interested party, the legality of acts of municipal self-government could become the object of judicial control, which was conducted within the judicial process. It has been revealed that one of the most important aspects of state supervision was the budget policy of city self-governments, the ways of income supplement of the city estimates and the expenditure. It has been proved that the vast majority of city public administrations of the Ekaterinoslav Province had cases of cancellation of decisions by the Provincial Presence in their practice. At the same time, the decisions of the supervisory institution during their appeal by local governments found support in the decisions of the Senate. It is shown that due to misinterpretation of the laws, the Presence made wrong decisions. This was the result of insufficient legal training of governors and other members of the Presence, unsatisfactory dissemination of information about the Senate’s practice in urban affairs. The scientific novelty of this study is implemented through the use of unpublished archival documents and published sources, which have not yet been introduced into scientific circulation and not used by scientists for historical analysis in order to reveal the essence of administrative supervision over municipal self-governments in the Ekaterinoslav Province (1870-1914).
References
Biliavska, O. S. (2015). Miske samovriaduvannia Kyieva v systemi orhaniv tsentralizovanoho administratyvnoho upravlinnia rosiiskoi imperii u XIX – na pochatku XX st. Storinky istorii, (39), 42-53. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Sisi_2015_39_7 (in Ukrainian).
Blinov, I. (1911). Otnosheniya Senata k mestnym uchrezhdeniyam v ХІХ veke. Sankt-Peterburg: Senatskaya tipografiya (in Russian).
Blinov, I. A., Gagen, V. A., Gogel, S. K. (1911). Istoriya Pravitelstvuyushchego senata za dvesti let. 1711-1911 gg. (T. 4). Sankt-Peterburg: Senatskaya tipografiya (in Russian).
Brower, D. (1990). The Russian City Between Tradition and Modernity, 1850-1900. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kantorovich, Ya. A. (Comps.). (1903). Sbornik opredeleniy Pervogo departamenta Pravitelstvuyushchego senata po gorodskim i zemskim delam za 10 let (1891-1900). Sankt-Peterburg (in Russian).
Kolychev, A. A. (Comps.). (1912). Kassatsionnaya praktika Pravitelstvennogo Senata po gorodskim i zemskim delam: Sbornik resheniy Grazhdanskogo i Ugolovnogo kassatsionnykh Departamentov i Obshchego ikh sobraniya za 45 let (1866-1911). Sankt-Peterburg (in Russian).
Konstantinova, V. M. (2010). Urbanizatsiia: pivdennoukrainskyi vymir (1861-1904 roky). Zaporizhzhia, AA Tandem (in Ukrainian).
Mantsevich, P. D. (Comps.). (1911). Ukazy Senata po gorodskim delam (1900-1910). Yaroslavl (in Russian).
Marchenko, O. (2011). Vzaiemodiia orhaniv miskoho samovriaduvannia z hubernskoiu administratsiieiu v 1870 – 1900-kh rokakh (na prykladi mista Yelysavethrada). Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Istorychni nauky, (14), 273-285. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nz_i_2011_14_35 (in Ukrainian).
Otchet Yekaterinoslavskoy gorodskoy upravy za 1888 god. (1889). Yekaterinoslav: Bratstva Sv. Vladimira (in Russian).
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. (1874). Vol. 45, Part 1, pp. 821–839. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. (1895). Vol. 12: 430–456. Sankt-Peterburg (in Russian).
Shara, L. (2015). Polozhennia 1892 r.: vplyv hubernatora ta Hubernskoho iz zemskykh i miskykh sprav prysutstviia na protses formuvannia y diialnist miskoho hromadskoho upravlinnia. Siverianskyi litopys, (5), 76-83. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/sl_2015_5_11 (in Ukrainian).
Yekaterinoslavskie gubernskie vedomosti (1875, may 3) (36). Yekaterinoslav (in Russian).
Yekaterinoslavskie gubernskie vedomosti (1883, iyul 23) (59). Yekaterinoslav (in Russian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Вадим Коробка, Юлія Коробка
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
