TRANSFORMATION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2021.1(1).225560

Keywords:

globalization, religious identity, glocalization, religion, narrow identity, polarization of religion, re-individualism, “patchwork religion”

Abstract

Based on empirical material and sociological research, the article analyzes the process of search, the formation of religious identity by modern human in the context of globalization. The ambiguity of the formation of religious identity is due to a complex combination of different factors. Thus, the ambiguity of the process gives rise to a variety of approaches in the modern vision, understanding and explanation of religious identity. They are formed in the process of constant correlation of religious and non-religious in modern religiosity. In the study of religious identity in the context of globalization, the author draws attention not only to the unifying tendencies of globalization, but also to its consequence – glocalization, which manifests itself in the religious sphere through differentiation, fragmentation, localization, cultural unification, primitivization of tastes, consumption. It is stated, firstly, that religious identity experiences constant transformations that correspond to changes in the cultural horizon. It is formed under the influence of a number of phenomena, among which we can point to religious fundamentalism, religious indifferentism (polarization of religion); extra-church searches for religious identity, as a consequence – re-individualism, eclecticism and “patchwork” of religious ideas, syncretism of perception of religion, pluralization of religious space, etc. Secondly, the assumption that the traditional process of formation of religious identity is not implemented in the contemporary cultural environment – neither at the personal nor at the community level – is increasingly confirmed. Religious identity is not thought of as a permanent characteristic, but as a result of a fundamentally open process of religious identification.

References

Abrams, D., Yaple, H., Wiener, R. (2011) A mathematical model of social group-competition with application to the growth of religious non-affiliation. Physical Review Letters 107:088,701. https://doi.oeg/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.088701

Amerikanskiy svyashchennik sdelal iz tserkvi tatu-salon. Retrieved from http://www.bagnet.org/news/world/171378 (In Russian)

Berger, P. (2003). Tserkov kak predprinimatel. Obshchestvo v epokhu plyuralizma trebuet novoy strategii. NG-religii. Retrieved from http://www.ng.ru/-ng_religii/2003-08-06/7_strategy.html (In Russian)

Bonhoeffer, D. (2009). Zhizn v khristianskom obshchenii. Retrieved from http://www.reformed.org.ua/2/391/Bonhoeffer (In Russian)

Dani z dopovidi Doslidnytskoho tsentru Piu (Рew Reseаrсh Сenter). Retrieved from https://businessviews.com.ua/ru/personal-life/id/grafik-dnja-kak-zhiteli-raznyh-stran-otnosjatsja-k-religii-1058/ (In Ukrainian)

De u sviti naibilshe ateistiv. Infohrafika. Retrieved from https://life.pravda.-com.ua/society/2017/07/19/225395/ (In Ukrainian)

Denz, H. (2009). Relіgіоn, Рорulаr Ріety, Раtсhwоrk Relіgіоn. Сhurсh аnd Relіgіоn іn Соntemроrаry Eurорe: Results frоm Emріrісаl аnd Соmраrаtіve Reseаrсh. Wіesbаden: VS Verlаg für Sоzіаlwіssensсhаften. GWV Fасhverlаge GmbH. Р.183.

Horokholinska, I. (2019). Postsekuliarnist: filosofski ta bohoslovski intentsii suchas-noi relihiinosti: monohrafiia. Chernivets. nats. un-t im. Yuriia Fedkovycha. Chernivtsi: ChNU : Ruta. 423 p. (In Ukrainian)

Kazanova, Kh. (2019). Relihiia v suchasnomu sviti: pliuralizm, sekuliaryzatsiia, hlobalizatsiiaю Pereklad z anhl. Romana Skakuna. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Ukrainskoho katolytskoho universytetu. 348 p. (In Ukrainian)

Keller, T. (2012). Razum za Boga: Pochemu sredi umnykh tak mnogo veruyush-chikh. Per. s angl. U.Saptsinoy. Moscow: Eksmo. 416 p. (In Russian)

Kolesnyk, I.M. (2016). Novitni relihiini techii ta rukhy: navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk. Lviv. 152 p. (In Ukrainian)

Planova tema viddilu filosofii ta istorii relihii Viddilennia relihiieznavstva Instytutu filosofii imeni H.S.Skovorody NAN Ukrainy «Relihiini identychnosti v konteksti kulturno-tsyvilizatsiinoho vyboru Ukrainy» (2017-2019), derzhavnyi reiestratsi-inyi № 0117U002127. (In Ukrainian)

Ruth, K. (2017). Sоuth Аfrіса’s Сhurсh оf Drіnkіn, Where Gоd Wоrshір аnd Аlсоhоl Gо Hаnd іn Hаnd. Retrieved from https://www.odditycentral.com/news/south-africas-church-of-drinking-where-god-worship-and-alcohol-go-hand-in-hand.html

Stepyko, M.T. (2020). Ukrainska identychnist u hlobalizovanomu sviti: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: Maidan. 258 p. (In Ukrainian)

Trоeltsсh, E. Dіe Zukunftsm6glісhkeіten des Сhrіstentums. Lоgоs 1 (1910/11). S. 165–185.

Tytarenko, V.V. (2017). Vid prorotstv u relihii do prohnozuvannia v relihiieznavstvi: istoriia, teoriia, perspektyvy: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Tsentr yevropy. 324 p. (In Ukrainian)

Unсоnventіоnаl Сhurсh Uses Heаvy Metаl Musіс tо Рreасh the Wоrd оf Gоd. Retrieved from httр://www.оddіtyсentrаl.соm/news/unсоnventіоnаl-сhurсh-uses-heаvy-metаl-musіс-tо-рreасh-the-wоrd-оf-gоd.html

Vіsіt Steрhen Huneсk's Dоg Сhарel іn Vermоnt. Retrieved from httрs://www.trірsаvvy.соm/steрhen-huneсks-dоg-сhарel-іn-vermоnt-1601323

Wuthnоw, R. (1998). Аfter Heаven: Sріrіtuаlіty іn Аmerіса Sіnсe the 1950s. Berkele: Unіversіty оf Саlіfоrnіа Рress. 277 рр. Р.2.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-13

How to Cite

Tytarenko, V. (2021). TRANSFORMATION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES. Skhid, 1(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2021.1(1).225560

Issue

Section

Philosophical anthropology