Metaphor as a development factor of the network society

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2020.1(165).222820

Keywords:

network theory, network society, metaphor, metatheory

Abstract

The formation of the methodological apparatus of network theory has been shown and the role of metaphor in the network society has been investigated to identify changes in reality and the emergence of new knowledge or a new variant of knowledge. It has been determined that thanks to metaphors, the paradigm of description of contemporary society has changed, which is now characterized as “network” or “web”, “flowing”, “dynamic”, “uneven” etc. The most famous attempts of such a description are the concept of new sociality by Z. Bauman and the actor-network theory by B. Latour. The latter allows considering the metaphor at the epistemological level of knowledge, i.e. in the processes of social construction. In this case, metaphors are used to build various kinds of metatheories that combine ways of substantiating and structuring knowledge about society, as well as determine the logical correlation of the main elements of analysis. An analysis of R. Haeussling’s network concept is given as an illustration of such possibilities of metaphor.

References

Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaya sovremennost (translat. from English). St.Petersburg: Piter, 240 p. (In Russian)

Capra, F. (2002). Pautina zhizni: Novoye nauchnoye ponimaniye zhivykh sistem. Moscow: Gelios. Retrieved from http://awake.kiev.ua/system/kapra.htm (In Russian).

Collins, R. (2002). Sotsiologiya filosofiy: globalnaya teoriya intellektualnogo izmeneniya (translat. from English). Novosibirsk. (In Russian).

Collins, R. (2009). Chetyrie sotsiologicheskikh traditsii (translat. from English). Moscow, 320 p. (In Russian)

Deleuze, J. & Guattari, F. (2010). Tysiacha plato. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya (translat. from English). Yekaterinburg, 895 p. (In Russian)

Durkheim, E. (1954). The elementary Forms of the Religions Life. Glencoe, P. 230-231.

Haeussling, R. (2003). Sotsiologicheskiye esse po osnovnym aspektam setevoy teorii (translat. from English). Мoscow, 192 p. (In Russian)

Lakoff, J. & Johnson, M. (2004). Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. (translat. from English). Moscow: Yeditorial URSS, 256 p. (In Russian).

Latour, B. (2006). Novogo vremeni ne bylo. Esse po simmetrichnoy antropologii (translat. from Franch). St.Petersburg: Izd-vo Yevrop. un-ta v S.-Peterburge, 240 p. (In Russian)

Simmel, G. (1996). Kak vozmozhno obshchestvo? (translat. from English). In: Izbrannoye. Vol.2. Moscow. 607 p. (In Russian)

Sivokon, A.S. (2016). Set: ot metafory k ontologicheskoy konstante. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriia Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. 1. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/set-ot-metafory-k-ontologicheskoy-konstante (In Russian)

Vasilkova, V. V. (2012). Seti v sotsialnom poznanii: ot metafory k metateorii. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii. № 5 (15). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/seti-v-sotsialnom-poznanii-ot-metafory-k-metateorii (In Russian).

Downloads

Published

2021-06-09

How to Cite

Schnitzer, M. (2021). Metaphor as a development factor of the network society. Skhid, (1(165), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2020.1(165).222820

Issue

Section

Social Philosophy