Personal development of person in models of cultural creation: ethical-philosophical reflexia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2020.3(167).206764Keywords:
personality, person, identification, moral identity, values, meaningsAbstract
The article deals with the issues of the essence of processes of personal development of a person as an implementation of its inner-spiritual potential. The subject of the research is formulated in the unity of the levels of conscious self-and world-attitude of the individual, which actualizes the problem of identity. The article focuses on the ethical components of the development of the internal-spiritual structure of the individual, it is stated that the value-semantic positions of the individual directly affect the development of consciousness and the identical formation of the person; the highest achievement of man in the processes of self-realization in the world of culture and public life, is a moral self-identification as a manifestation of conscious responsibility and responsibility of the individual in the plane of social expression. The source catalogue of the research distinguishes the works of philosophical, cultural and others spheres, in which the problem of personal development of person, the value-semantic parameters of its socio-cultural life is considered in the aspects of understanding the nature of the man searching for a meaning, the ability to cultural creation. Identification of unexplored parts of the general problem. The article focuses on the ethical dimensions of human existence in the modern world, emphasizing that a person is capable of cultivating the social environment due to the possibilities of inner-spiritual perception of reality and change of one's being. The human ethos unfolds in the direction of implementing processes of cultural cultivation, which has a decisive influence both on the processes of improving the inner world of the individual, and on the "cultural space" of the environment. According to the ethical and cultural approach, the problem of personal development of man is presented from the standpoint of philosophical and methodological analysis, research is concentrated on the creative meaning of such semantic concepts as "personality", "identity", "morality", "senses", etc. The author analyzes the ethical and semantic basis of personal self-determination of an individual, which originates as an individualized potential of the way out of the outer world and designing the "image of oneself" in the conditions of this world. The specificity of human personality development is based on the recognition of the principled dialogicity of human existence, expressed by the combination of the ideal orientation of the moral world of the human "self" and the problem of objective requirements of social reality as the practice of organizing interpersonal relations. The research presents a generalization according to which, under the influence of culture, a person undergoes internal transformations, which is a necessary condition for the creation of the identity, which is not derived directly from social influences, but is the result of reflection, comprehension, value relation, and efforts of self-consciousness - due to these cultural-making opportunities of a person the functioning of the world of everyday life is possible, modern personalized practices of life are being constructed and embodied in the collective forms of human coexistence.References
Baudrillard, Zh. (2004). Symuliakry i symuliatsiia [Simulacra and simulation]. (V. Khovkhun, Trans). Kyiv: Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko "Osnovy" (In Ukrainian).
Bauman, Z. (2002). Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized society]. (V.L. Ynozemtseva, Transl.). Moscow. Lohos (In Russian).
Berdiaev, N. (1990). Samopoznanye. Opyt fylosofskoi avtobyohrafyy [Self-discovery. Experience of philosophical autobiography]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenyia (In Russian).
Felicitas Munzel, G. (2019) Cultivating moral consciousness: The quintessential relation of practical reason and mind (Gemüt) as a bulwark against the propensity for radical evil, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51 (13): 1351-1360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1532288
Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskakh smysla [Man’s search for meaning]. Moscow: Prohress (In Russian).
Fromm, Е. (1992). Dusha cheloveka [Soul of man]. Moscow: Respublika (In Russian).
Höffe, O. (2003). Rozum i pravo. Skladovi interkulturnoho pravovoho dyskursu [Reason and law. Components of intercultural legal discourse]. Transl. from Germ. Kyiv: Alterpress (In Ukrainian).
Kavalski, E. (2020). Inside/Outside and Around: Complexity and the Relational Ethics of Global Life, Global Society, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1745158.
Krymskyi, S. B. (1992). Kontury dukhovnosti: novi konteksty indentyfykatsii [Outlines of Spirituality: New Contexts of Identification]. Voprosy fylosofii. 12: 38-64 (In Russian).
Krymskyi, S. B. (2003). Zapyty filosofskykh smysliv. [Requests for philosophical meanings]. Kyiv: Parapan (In Ukrainian).
Luman, N. (2007). Sotsyalnye sistemy. Ocherk obshchei teoryy [Social systems. Essay on the general theory]. St. Petersburg: Nauka (In Russian).
Lyotard, Zh.-F. (1998). Sostoianye postmoderna [The state of postmodern]. Moscow-SPb.: Aleteya (In Russian).
Mamardashvyly, M. (1988). Neobkhodimost sebia [Self need]. Moscow: Nauka (In Russian).
Mamardashvyly, M. (2014). Soznanye i tsivilizatsyia [Consciousness and civilization]. St.Petersburg: Lenyzdat (In Russian).
McIntosh, E. (2011). John Macmurray's Religious Philosophy: What it Means to be a Person. London/New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 278.
Moran, K. A. (2019). Misunderstanding duty: Vices of culture, ‘aggravated’ vice, and the role of casuistical questions in moral education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(13): 1361-1371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1516137
Morshchakova, O. S. (2013). Tsinnist u psykhokulturnomu butti liudyny yak osobystosti [Value in the psycho-cultural being of a man as a personality]. Ternopіl: Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 1, 80-89 (In Ukrainian).
Novhorodtsev, P. Y. (1991). Ob obshchestvennom ideale [About the public ideal]. Moscow: Pressa (In Russian).
Pareto, V. (1978). Complendio di sociologia generale. Torino. Lesco (In Italian).
Pazenok, V. S. (1990). Sotsialna kultura i sotsialna tvorchist [Social culture and social creativity]. Kyiv: Znannia (In Ukrainian).
Rorty, R. (1996). Sluchainost, ironiia i solidarnost [Accident, irony and solidarity]. Transl. from English: I.Heinstanoy, R.Hestanova. Moscow: Russian phenomenological society (In Russian).
Sartr, Zh.-P. (1953). Ekzystentsializm - eto humanizm [Existentialism is humanism]. Transl. from Fr. M.Hretskoi. Moscow: Izd-vo inostr. lit. (In Russian).
Shpet, H. H. (2007). Javlenie i smysl [Phenomenon and meaning]. Moscow: Dyrekt-Medya (In Russian).
Shynkaruk, V. (1994). Vira, nadiia, liubov [Faith, Hope, Love]. Viche, 4: 145-150 (In Ukrainian).
Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Kritika cynicheskava razuma [Criticism of the Cynical Reason]. Transl. from germ. A.Pertsev. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, Moscow: AST Moscow (In Russian).
Steen, J. A. (2012). The Human Rights Philosophy as a Values Framework for the Human Behavior Course: Integration of Human Rights Concepts in the Person-in-Environment Perspective, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 853-862.
Stepin, V. S. (1994). Filosofiia i obrazy budushcheho [Philosophy and images of the future]. Voprosy fylosofii, 6: 10-21 (In Russian).
Tabachkovskyi, V. H. (2006). Zhyttievyi svit liudyny i piznannia: personalistychna interpretatsiia [The vital world of man and cognition: a personalistic interpretation]. Filosofska dumka, 2: 34-48 (In Ukrainian).
Tsennosty [Values] (2003). Kultura i kulturolohyia. Slovar (A.Y.Kravchenko, red.). Moscow: Akademycheskyi proekt, Ekaterynburg. Delovaia knyha (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Nadiya Hnasevych, Olena Morshchakova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.