The evolution of a church and religious role in the Ukrainian national and cultural Renaissance in the second half of the 19th - the first third of the 20th century: the modern historiography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2019.6(164).185959Keywords:
national and cultural Renaissance, modern historiography, religion, religious thought, church, state, spirituality, culture, national identity, secularization, clericalAbstract
The Ukrainian historiographical narrative of the religious and church place and role in the Ukrainian national and cultural Renaissance, and in the national liberation movement in the second half of the 19th and the first third of the 20th century is analyzed in the issue. The modern historians consider the ecclesiastical and religious factors of the Ukrainian Renaissance according to two levels. The first level reveals the history of religious thought, the representatives of which study the religious reflections of the prominent figures in culture, education, religion and literature, the second level conveys the history of the church life in Ukraine, the analysis of the church institutes’ role and place in the Ukrainian modern national and cultural Renaissance (the activity of UGCC, the Unification Council of the Eastern Orthodox Churches of Ukraine, the UAOC, etc.) is presented. A defined historiographical issue complies with the evolutional levels of a religious and ecclesiastical component in the modern spiritual, cultural, political and civil processes, namely the development of religious thought and institutional orientation of church and parish-based education in the second half of the 19th century contributed to the ecclesiastical and religious integration with the national democratic society and state establishment in the early 20th century. The scope of the church and religious activity on the Ukrainian lands had a moderate character in the second half of the 19th century compared to the first decades of the “long century”. The Ukrainian lands were divided politically as well as confessional that strengthened sacral indifference and “religious absenteeism”. The positive fact was that the modern historians had left politicization in the sacral and religious issues’ consideration which was a mainstream in the Soviet period. The scientists support a common thought that despite an institutional weakness of the church and religious life on the Ukrainian lands in the second half of the 19th century, the religion and faith were preserved as the essential features of the Ukrainian mentality, and as a result plays a crucial role in the Ukrainian cultural and spiritual development, put a base for the further governmental struggle. A final conclusion was drawn that the religious thought development, the prominent thinkers’ reflections about the Ukrainian Christianity and national church phenomena prepared the necessary conditions for the regularizing and further building of the Ukrainian church life in the beginning of the 20th century.References
Kolodny, A. (ed.) (2000). Akademichne relihiyeznavstvo. Kyiv: Svit znan. (In Ukrainian)
Andrusyshyn, B. I. (1997). Tserkva v Ukrayinskiy derzhavi 1917-1920 rr. (doba Dyrektoriyi UNR). Kyiv: Lybid. (In Ukrainian)
Hanzulenko, V. P. (2007). Ukrayinska Derzhava 1917-1920 rr.: Problema vyroblennya realnoho pytannya. Naukovi pratsi naukovykh robitnykiv Zaporizkoho universytetu. Issue. ХХІ: 165-167. (In Ukrainian)
Dashkevych, Ya. (1993). Ukrayina vchora i nyni: Narysy, vystupy, ese. Kyiv: AN Ukrayiny; In-t ukr. arkheohrafiyi. 192 p. (In Ukrainian)
Ivanyshyn, V. (1990). Ukrayinska tserkva i protses natsionalnoho vidrodzhennya. Ed.2. Drohobych: Vidrodzhennya, 96 p. (In Ukrainian)
Kalakura, Ya. S. and Rafalsky, O. O. and Yuri, M. F. (2017). Mentalnyy vymir ukrayinskoyi tsyvilizatsiyi. Kyiv: Heneza, 560 p. (In Ukrainian)
Kalakura, Ya. S., and Rafalsky, O. O. and Yuri, M. F. (2015). Ukrayinska kultura: tsyvilizatsiynyy vybir. Kyiv: IPiEND im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrayiny, 496 p. (In Ukrainian)
Kyrydon, A. M. (2017). Tserkva v umovakh revolyutsiynoho zlamu 1917 roku. In: Babenko, L. L. (comp.) and Mishchenko, I. O. (comp.) (2017). Ukrayinska natsionalna revolyutsiya 1917-1921 rokiv kriz pryzmu suchasnosti (do 100-richchya podiyi): Proceeding paper conference. Poltava: 24-35. (In Ukrainian)
Kyrydon, A. M. (2013). Relihiyno-tserkovne zhyttya v period Hetmanatu: problemne pole vzayemodiyi. Natsionalna ta istorychna pamyat. Issue 7: 252-259. (In Ukrainian)
Kolesnyk, I. (2016). Instytut istoriyi Ukrayiny: nove ukrayinske Vidrodzhennya. Kyiv: In-t istoriyi Ukrayiny, 273 p. (In Ukrainian)
Kolodny, A. M., Fylypovych, L. O. (1993). Problema natsionalnoho i relihiynoho v naukoviy spadshchyni M. Drahomanova. In: Sotsialno-filosofski idei Mykhayla Drahomanova. Kyiv, 88-93. (In Ukrainian)
Kolodny, A. M., Fylypovych, L. O. (1996). Relihiyna dukhovnist ukrayintsiv: vyyavy, postati, stan. Lviv: Lohos, 1996. 184 p. (In Ukrainian)
Kondratyk, L. (2004). Relihiya u spadshchyni Mykyty Shapovala. Ukrayinske relihiyeznavstvo. №1 (29): 103-113. (In Ukrainian)
Kondratyk, L. (2017). Mykhaylo Hrushevskyy i Vyacheslav Lypynskyy pro vplyv reformatsiynykh idey na ukrayinsku suspilnist ta orhanizatsiyni formy relihiynoho zhyttya. Relihiya ta Sotsium. № 2 (26): 69-75. (In Ukrainian)
Kondratyk, L. (2003). Oleksandr Lototskyy pro narod yak aktyvnyy chynnyk tserkovnoho zhyttya. Filosofski obriyi. №10: 138-141. (In Ukrainian)
Kondratyk, L. (2005). Filosofsko-sotsiolohichnyy analiz relihiyeznavchoyi spadshchyny diyachiv ukrayinskoho natsionalnoho Vidrodzhennya pochatku XX stolittya (Master's thesis). Grigory Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine.
Kondratyk, O. V. (1999). Fenomen relihiyi u filosofiyi istoriyi M. S. Hrushevskoho. (Master's thesis). Grigory Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine.
Popovych, M. V. (1998). Narys istoriyi kultury Ukrayiny. Kyiv: ArtEk, 728 p. (In Ukrainian)
Radko, P. H. (2011). Istorychna rol khrystyyanskoyi viry ta pravoslavnoyi tserkvy v rozbudovi ta konsolidatsiyi ukrayinskoho suspilstva (istoriohrafichnyy aspekt). Aktualni problemy relihiyeznavstva: Proceeding paper conference, Poltava, 10.20. 2010. Poltava: PNPU imeni V. H. Korolenka: 67-77. (In Ukrainian)
Relihiynyy chynnyk u protsesakh natsiye- ta derzhavotvorennya: dosvid suchasnoyi Ukrayiny (2012). Kyiv: Instytut politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen imeni I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrayiny, 272 p. (In Ukrainian)
Rybachuk, M. F., Utkin, O. I., Kyryushko, M. I. (1995). Natsionalne vidrodzhennya i relihiya. Kyiv: Asotsiatsiya «Ukrayina», 208 p. (In Ukrainian)
Sarbey, V. H. (1999). Natsionalne vidrodzhennya Ukrayiny. Kyiv: Alternatyvy, 336 p. (In Ukrainian)
Semerhey, N. V. (2017). Relihiyeznavcha dumka, dukhovni praktyky ta tserkovne zhyttya v dobu ukrayinskoho natsionalno-kulturnoho vidrodzhennya druhoyi polovyny XX stolittya: intertekst istoriohrafiy. Istorychna pamyat. Issue 37: 110-116. (In Ukrainian)
Zashkilnyak, L. (ed.) (2004). Ukrayinska istoriohrafiya na zlami XX i XXI stolit: zdobutky i problemy. Lviv: I. Franko Lviv National University, 405 p. (In Ukrainian)
Ulyanovsky, V. I. (1997a). Tserkva v Ukrayinskiy Derzhavi 1917-1920 rr. (doba Hetmanatu Pavla Skoropadskoho). Kyiv: Lybid, 1997. 320 p. (In Ukrainian)
Ulyanovsky, V. I. (1997b). Tserkva v Ukrayinskiy Derzhavi 1917-1920 rr. (doba Ukrayinskoyi Tsentralnoyi Rady). Kyiv: Lybid, 1997. 198 p. (In Ukrainian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Nataliia Semerhei
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.