International models, trends and concepts of the philosophy of education in the context of sustainable social development under global institutional transformation conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2019.1(159).157942Keywords:
educational systems, philosophy of education, educational management, models of philosophy of education, social development, pedagogy, higher education, upbringing, democracy, globalization, internationalization, integration, transformationsAbstract
At the turn of the Millennium, the issue of education, especially higher education, its role in state formation and impact on the life of society acquired particular relevance and became a subject of research of not only teachers and historians but also economists, political analysts, psychologists, social scientists and, above all, philosophers (which gave rise to a variety of models and trends in the philosophy of education).
In the meantime, there is some lack of fundamental integrative studies into comprehensive educational-managerial and socio-historical, socio-economic and state-political experiences of some developed countries in the implementation of these philosophical and educational paradigms, trends, models and reforming/modernization concepts of higher education and science, to be examined with consideration for similar challenges faced by education and science in Ukraine.
Nearly every developed country has wide experience in building up a system of higher education. Results of reviewing such experience may contribute to the development and enrichment of the domestic educational system, afford an opportunity to avoid repeating mistakes and offer new approaches to solving a range of problems in this field.
Based on the above, we also believe that it is impossible to pretend to develop a strategy for educational and scientific modernization reforms that deal with challenges of educational and scientific institution of society in management of scientific and educational space (which applies to both a social component of the philosophy of education and the field of educational management) without analyzing the existing models, schools, trends and their classification in the modern philosophy of education.
References
Zіnchenko, V. V. (2014). Globalіzacіja і globalіstika. “Novij Svіt-2000” Lviv, 420 p. (In Ukrainian).
Zinchenko, V. V. (2017). Globalnye transformacii sovremennosti. (Vol.1. Sistemnye globalnye transformatsii). Palmarium Academic Publishing, 244 p. (In Russian).
Zіnchenko, V. V. (2018). Ekzistencіjno-dіalogіchna model fіlosofіyi osvіty: osvіtnio-vihovna ta socіalno-dukhovna komunіkacіja u kontekstі suspіlnogo rozvitku. Fіlosofіja osvіty (Philosophy of Education). 1(22): 115-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2018-22-1-115-133 (In Ukrainian).
Marsel, G. (1994). Byt i imet. Saguna, Novocherkassk, 159 p. (In Russian).
Munje, E. (1994). Chto takoe personalizm? Izdatelstvo. gumanitarnoj literatury, Moscow, 128 pp. (In Russian).
Shtejner, R. (1993). Otcherk teorii poznanija Gjotevskogo mirovozzrenija. Parsefal, Moscow, 142 p. (In Russian).
Combs, А. (2013). Humanism, education and future. Boston: Educational Leadership, 301 р. (In English).
Combs, A. W. (2011). The Schools We Need: New Assumptions for Educational Reform. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 178 р. (In English).
Bollnow, О. F. (1999). New security. The problem of overcoming existentialism. Stuttgart, Köln: Kohlhammer, 247 p. (In English).
Boyd, D. Pedagogy for the Reign of God: A Theological Perspective on the Educational Philosophy of Paulo Freire. Eastern University Working Papers. Retrieved from http://ngoleader.org/articles/56/4/Paulo-Freire/Page4.html (In English).
Buchanan, P. J. (2002). The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 320 p. (In English).
Bufford, Th. (2001). Toward а Philosophy Education. Boston: World-Press, 278 р. (In English).
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan Company, 212 p. (In English).
Feinberg, W. (1994). Behavioral theory and education. Boston: Prentice-Hall, 467 p. (In English).
Harris, A. (2006). Teaching Morality and Religion. London: Allen and Unwin, 127 p. (In English).
Harris, К. (2002). Teachers and Classes. A Social Analysis. Edinburgh: Education Press, 216 p. (In English).
Hirst, P. (2004). Moral Education in а Secular Society. London: University of London Press, 123 p. (In English).
Kellner, D. (2009). Critical Theory, Marxism, and Modernity. Cambridge, UK and Baltimore, Md.: Polity Press and John Hopkins University Press, 288 р. (In English).
Kelly, E. (2002). The fully functioning self. In.: Combs A. (ed.) Perceiving, Behaving, Becoming: A New Focus for Education. Assn for Supervision & Curriculum, 127 р. (In English).
Kohlberg, L. (2000). Education for а just society (Moral Development, Moral Education. Ethics and Educational Policy). Birmingham: Munsey, 496 p. (In English).
Lichtman, R. (2012). The Production of Desire: The Integration of Psychoanalysis into Marxist Theory. New York, NY: The Free Press, 482 р. (In English).
Nohl, H. (1981). Educational Science (Pedagogical, Psychological and Sociological Foundations of Pedagogy). Ed. 2. Langensalza. Weinheim/Basel, 344 p. (In German).
Peters, R. (2009). Education and Values. N-Y: Sloan, 229 p. (In English).
Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and Personality. Scotland: HarperCollins Publishers, 293 p. (In English).
Rogers, C. R. (2012). «Toward Becoming a Fully Functioning Person». In: Perceiving, Behaving, Becoming: A New Focus for Education. Yearbook. Ed. A.W. Combs (edited by A.W. Combs). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 256 р. (In English).
Sintschenko, V. V. (2017). Global transformations of the present. Volume 1. Systemic global transformation. Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 244 p. (In German).
Sintschenko, V. V. (2017). Global worldview of modernity on the way to a new consciousness. The homo oecologicus universalis ("the global ecological man") as a social and economic model. Creative Economics and Social Innovations. № 1. 7 (18): 126-140. (In German).
Zinchenko, V. (2015). Institutional transformations systems of society and perspectives of critical theory in the social philosophy of education. Pedagogikа Filozoficznа. № 1: 59-68. Retrieved from http://pedagogika-filozoficzna.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/59-68-zinchenko.pdf (In English).
Zinchenko, V. (2018). Humanistic Values and Enlightenment Strategies of Global Society in the Potential of the Sustainable Development of Democracy. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol 4. no. 1: 1-13. (In English).
Žižek, S. (2000). The Ticklish Subject. The Absent Center of Political Ontology. London: Verso, 221 р. (In English).
Warnock, М. (2007). Schools of Thought. London: Faber, 2007. 176 p. (In English).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Viktor Zinchenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
