Economic systems: scientific cognition methodology and classification criteria


  • Liana Dmytrychenko Mikhail Tugan-Baranovsky National University of Economics and Trade, Ukraine



basis and superstructure, economic system humanistic constituent, socioeconomic formation, civilization, economic system, economic laws


The paper explores methodological approaches to determination of the essence and criteria of economic system classification. Among diversified approaches to classification of economic systems two major ones are identified, namely formational and civilizational. Researchers' views of the relation between these approaches are reviewed.

It is reasoned that out of the two methodological approaches to periodization of economic systems the formational one is the most correct technique from the scientific viewpoint. It is more complete compared to the civilizational approach as it allows for all basic and superstructural elements of the economic system. In addition, basing on the method of abstraction in cognition of the essence of the phenomenon under consideration, it identifies its master elements - production forces and production relations. It is known that the main place in the production force system belongs to the man. It is therefore incorrect to consider that the formational approach ignores the man and a humanistic constituent of the economic system.

The development logic of society (social and economic systems) is as follows:

- development of production forces brings about development of economic relations, property relations;

- property relations promote production of commodities through the economic interest;

- development of commodity production results in formation of socially oriented market economy;

- the highest development stage of socially oriented market economy is information economy;

- the economic system of the present-day capitalism undergoes socialization of production relations, which leads to development of immediate social production, to a new socioeconomic formation.

Author Biography

Liana Dmytrychenko, Mikhail Tugan-Baranovsky National University of Economics and Trade

Ph.D. in Economics, Assistant Professor


Seligman, Ben (1968), Key trends of modern economic thought, Progress Publishing,Moscow, 600 p. (rus).

Semenov A.V. (2001), Economy and society: processes of modernization and transformation (theory questions), Narodny uchitel,Moscow, 281 p. (rus).

Halchynskyi A.S. (2010), The economic methodology. Logic update, ADEF-Ukraine, Kyiv, p. 3-17 (ukr).

Zaitsev Yu.K. (2012), Modern approaches in methodology knowledge of patterns and trends of economic systems, in: Scientific notes of Kyiv National Economic University. Vadym Hetman, № 14, Part 2, pp. 3-13, available at: (ukr).

Sazhyna M.A. (2011), Scientific bases of economic policy (Economic Thought), Forum: Infra-M,Moscow(rus).

Chukhno A.A. (2006), Works: In three volumes. Volume 2. Information postindustrial economy: theory and practice, Kyiv National University Press, Kyiv, 512 p. (ukr).

Osadchaya I. O. (1991), On the civilizational approach to the analysis of capitalism, Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 5 (rus).

Porokhovskiy A. (2005), National model of economic development, Economy and Management, № 5, pp. 35-44 (rus).

Barkley Rosser Jr., Marina V. Rosser (1996), Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy, Irwin, 1996, 488 p. (eng).

Conklin, David W. (1991), Comparative Economic Systems, Cambridge University Press, 427 p. (eng).

Gregory Paul and Stuart Robert C. (2003), Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century, Cengage Learning, 558 р. (eng).

Gabriele A. and Schettino Fr. (2007), Market socialism as a distinct socioeconomic formation internal to the modern mode of production, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, available at: (eng).

Veremiyenko T. S. (2012), Social and cultural criteria of economic development concepts, Efektyvna ekonomika. Electronic scientific specialized edition, № 5 available at: (ukr).

Douma, Sytse W. and Schreuder Hein (2013), Economic Approaches to Organizations, 5th edition, Harlow (UK), Pearson (eng).

Frolov I.T., ed. (1987), Philosophical dictionary, 5th edition, Politizdat,Moscow, 590 p. (rus).

Marx, Karl (1975), Book Synopsis Lewis H. Morgan «Prehistoric Society» in: K. Marx and F. Engels, Vol. 2nd ed, Part 45, Moscow, pp. 227-372 (rus).

Engels, Fridrish (1961), Origin family, chastnoy property and state, in: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Vol. 2nd ed,Moscow, Part 21 (rus).

Rostow W.W. (1960), The Stages of Economic Growth: A non-communist manifesto, Cambridge University Press, available at: doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511625824

Galbraith J. (1976), Economic theory and goals of the company, Progress Publishing,Moscow, available at: (rus).

Raymond, Aron (1967), The Industrial Society. Three Essays on Ideology and Development, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 18, 455-456. doi: 10.237/588674

Mochernyi S. V. (2001), Methodology of Economic Research, Svit Publishing, Lviv, 415 p. (ukr).

During the year the number of millionaires has grown inUkraine(01.10.2016), RIA NovostiUkraine, available at:­365961238.html (rus).

Ukraine’s GDP, available at: (rus).

The gap between rich and poor continues to grow (05.21.2015), Russian Service, available at: (rus).

Oxfam: richest 1% owns half of global funds (01.15.2015), Russian Service, available at:



How to Cite

Dmytrychenko, L. (2016). Economic systems: scientific cognition methodology and classification criteria. Skhid, (3(143).