The system of social responsibility of the society

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2016.2(142).70601

Keywords:

essential sign of social being, social responsibility, social principle, social law, social norm

Abstract

The author's concept of social responsibility locates in article as essential sign of social being. Social responsibility appears as a dialectical unity of opposites - the freedom and necessity, the degree of freedom and the need to measure, which must comply with the requirements of all subjects of public relations, as the requirements of the law (measures is the law). Responsible communications and dependences, as the general factor of social self-organization, creates society structure on a vertical (society - a social community - the personality) and across (ecology, economy, policy, the right, morals, an esthetics, religion). As the general social integrator of social being social responsibility can be identified as the general social principle. The principle of social responsibility, subsystem (ecological, political and others) the principles, laws and norms represent dialectic unity general, special and single.

The article substantiates the idea that the growth of social responsibility is an basic law of the sociology. For this, he presents the history of mankind as an evolutionary change in forms of social responsibility.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Shybko, Mariupol Institute of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management

PhD, assistant professor of social sciences and psychology Department

References

On Amendments to the Constitution ofUkraine. Law of Ukraine № 2222-1V on December 8, 2004, available at: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2222-15 (ukr).

Andreev Yu. P. (1985), Content and structure of public relations, Publishing House of Saratov University Press, Saratov, 171 p. (rus).

Afanasiev V. G. (1980), System and Society, Politizdat, Moscow, 368 p. (rus).

Bell D. (1999), The coming post-industrial society: social forecasting experience, Academy Publishing, Moscow, 949 p. (rus).

Drucker Peter (2007), Management Tasks XXI century, Williams Ltd, Moscow, 272 p. (rus).

Parnyuk M. A., Lazarenko B. P., Prichepy Ye. N. and other (1987), Categories «law» and «chaos», Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 294 p. (rus).

Kutsenko V. I. (1972), Social problems as a category of historical materialism, Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 371 p. (rus).

North Douglas (1997), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, available at: http: //gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/6310/ (rus).

Plakhotny A. F. (1981), The problem of social responsibility, Vyshcha Schkola, Kharkiv, 192 p. (rus).

Ritzer George (2002), Modern sociological theory, Piter Publishing, Sankt-Petersburg, 688 p. (rus).

Ruchka A. A. (1976), Social values and norms, Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 152 p. (rus).

Svidersky V. I., Zobov R. A. (1979), Ratio as a category of materialist dialectics, Voprosy filosofii, № 1, pp. 88-95 (rus).

Toffler Alvin (1999), Third Wave, Izdatelstvo AST, Moscow, 261 p. (rus).

Touraine Alain (1998), Return of a man of action. Essay Sociology, Science World Publishing, Moscow, 204 p. (rus).

Ouledov A. K. (1975), Sociological laws, Znaniye, Moscow, 295 p. (rus).

Ouledov A. K., Popov V. D. (1979), Sociological laws, knowledge and management, Znaniye, Moscow, 64 p. (rus).

Friedman M. (2006), Capitalism and Freedom, New Publishing House, Moscow, 240 p. (rus).

Shybko O. I. (2013), Ecological imperative in the system of public social responsibility, Skhid, № 2 (122), pp. 129-133 (ukr).

Shybko O. I. (2012), The growth of social responsibility as an objective law of civilized progress, Skhid, № 5 (119), pp. 150-153 (ukr).

Shybko O. I. (2011), The rules in the social responsibility, Skhid, № 5 (112), pp. 136-139 (ukr).

Shybko O. I. (2011), The essence of the Ukrainian national idea, Skhid, № 4 (111), p. 145-149 (ukr).

Published

2016-06-04

How to Cite

Shybko, O. (2016). The system of social responsibility of the society. Skhid, (2(142), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2016.2(142).70601

Issue

Section

Philosophy