Features of the prosecutor's office of personnel policy Soviet Ukraine in the 1920s
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2016.2(142).70551Keywords:
the prosecutor's office, personnel policy, professionalism, justice, courtAbstract
This article analyzes the unstudied aspects of the formation of the personnel policy of the Soviet Ukraine's prosecutor's office in the 1920s. The theme is caused by necessity of reforming the modern law enforcement. Research tasks were solved by using scientific methods, analysis, synthesis, synthesis and comparison.
The author has made an analysis of personnel policy of the Soviet government in the 1920s. The purpose of this policy was a constant increase in the number of prosecutors from among the workers and peasants. This led to a significant reduction in the level of professionalism of staff. To enhance the professionalism of prosecutors government organized short-term courses and University School of Law. But they were not able to fully meet the demand for specialists. In order to improve the efficiency of the prosecutor's office in the regions of the Soviet Ukrainian government workers have established forms of staff development as a legal society. In conflict with the government prosecutors are not always won local lawlessness. Attraction prosecutors to work in government agencies has allowed to avoid conflicts. By the end of the 1920s staffing problems were solved and the prosecutor's office, began to deal with the tasks of the party elite, who actually had a monopoly on power. The dominant influence of government on the implementation of personnel policy accompanied by a prosecutor during the Soviet period. In future research the author will be related to the analysis of problems of law enforcement agencies of the state in terms of crisis and democratic reforms.References
Personnel policy Public Prosecutor, available at: http://obozrevatel.com/politics (rus).
Reform of the Prosecutor’s Office, available at: http://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/reforms (rus).
Grytsayenko L. І. (2008), Historical of the prosecution in Ukraine, in: Visnyk prokuratury [Prosecution Bulletin], № 2, pp. 94-105 (ukr).
Koshman O. V. (2011), History of the prosecution in the XIX-XX centuries, in: Visnyk prokuratury [Prosecution Bulletin], № 9, pp. 114-117 (ukr).
Murza V. (2001), The prosecutor’s office of the Ukrainian SSR and the higher institutes of state power (1920-1930 years), in: Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, № 16, pp. 273-279 (rus).
Usemko I. (1995), Ukrainein the years of the NEP: the fate of the course on the legality, Kharkiv, 53 p. (rus).
Shestopalov L. (2012), Historical background of formation and development of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine, in: Vestnik Dnepropetrovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta vnutrennikh del, № 2, pp. 143-152 (rus).
Slivenko V. A. (2015), Evolution Bolshevik views on crime and law enforcement in 1920, in: Problemy politychnoi istorii Ukrainy, № 10, pp. 131-137 (ukr).
Slivenko V. A. (2015), Formation of a new system of professional training law enforcement system of staff of the Ukrainian SSR in 1920, in: Uchenye zapiski Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. M. Masherova, №19 (285), pp. 17-30 (rus).
Directory of CPSU history, available at: http://www.knowbysight.info (rus).
History Prosecutor of Ukraine, available at: http://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/dark_ages.html (ukr).
State Archives of Dnipropetrovsk region, fond 1518, opys 1, sprava 4, 126 p. (ukr).
State Archives of Mykolayiv region, fond 122, opys 1, sprava 1, 170 p. (ukr).
State Archives of Odessa region, fond 1190, opys 1, sprava 5, 136 p. (ukr).
Central State Archive of Public Organizations of Ukraine, fond 1, opys 2, sprava 2100, 371 p. (ukr).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Vyacheslav Slivenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.