The idea of God in the heritage of the Ukrainian philosophers (40-th years of XIX-50-th years of XX centuries): меthodological contradictons and prospects
Keywords:Idea of God, methodological controversies, Universe, philosophy of religion, (inter)religious communications, synthesis, human being
In this article the author considers the idea of God and the system of His names in the context of the structure of a human being and the universe on the basis of the analysis of the Ukrainian thinkers of 40th years of XIX - 50th years of XX centuries works. The author also stresses that from the view's history of philosophy the use of etymological, semantic and evolutionary approaches allow stressing that the idea of God contains Hebrew and ancient Greek meanings and in the process of becoming undergo changes. The author also shows that the given idea helped to form interreligious communications and analyses interdisciplinary character of the idea of God, which was manifested in its philosophical and religious synthesis. The author stresses: Ukrainian thinkers as N. Berdiаiev, S. Bulhakov, A. Giliarov, S. Gogots'ky, Metr. Ilarion [Ohiyenko], O. Kozlov, I. Maksymovych, O. Novyts'ky and others were introduced the new approaches to comprehending of the idea of God on the border of interreligious communications and interdisciplinary space. Since those thinkers consider the possibility of typification of the common and the different in the spiritual life of the representatives of those religions.
Berdyаyev N. (1907), Sub æspecie teranitatis. Philosophical, Social and Literary Experiments (1900-1906), Izdaniye Pirozhkova, Saint-Petersburg, 437 р. (rus).
Berdyаyev N. (1908), Origin of evil and sense in the history, in: Voprosy Filosofii i Psikhologii, book 4 (94),Moscow, pp. 287-334 (rus).
Bulgakov S. (1914), Transcendental Problem of Religion, in: Voprosy Filosofii i Psikhologii, book 4 (124),Moscow, pp. 580-652 (rus).
Voloshyn V. (2013), Methods of Scientific Cognition in Religion: What Can They be Today?, in: Filosofska dumka. Sententiae: Special edition IV, book IV, Kyiv, рр. 309-318 (ukr).
Voloshyn V. (2015), Arguments in favor of the hypothesis of basic and universal attribute of religious conscience, in: Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu [Buleten University of Cherkasy]. «Philosophy» Series, iss. 11(304), Cherkasy, рр. 77-86 (ukr).
Havdiak O. V. (2012), Religious-philosophical problems in national scientific space of the 19-early 20th centuries, in: Gileya, 2012, iss. 61(№6), Kyiv, рр. 486-491 (ukr).
Volkov A. G. [comp., ed.] (2007), Philosophy in Its Essence, Significance and History of Aleksey Gilyarov, [vol. 1], Izdatelskii Dom MGT, Melitopol, 352 p. (rus).
[Gogotsky S.]. Philosophical Lexicon. vol. 1: А.B.V, V Universitetskoy Tipografii, Kyiv, II р.+ 579 р. + IV р. (rus).
Zenkovskiy V. V. (1926), Autonomy and Theonomy, in: Put, № 3, pp.46-64 (rus).
Zenkovskiy V. (1932), On the meaning of imagination in spiritual life (on the subject of the book Ethics of Transformed Eros by B. P. Vysheslavtsev), in: Put, № 2,Paris, pp. 90-102 (rus).
Zenkovskiy V. (1997), Fundamentals of Christian Philosophy, Кanon +, Moscow, 560 p. (rus).
Ilarion Arkhyiep [Ohiyenko] (1943) «Accept the Spirit of Holy Wisdom, Reason, the Spirit of God’s Fear». Epiphany Address, Sviata Danylova Hora, Chоlm, 19 p. (ukr).
Ilarion [Metr.] [Ohiyenko] (1952), Relation of reason to faith, in: Nasha Kultura, iss. 5 (170),Winnipeg, рр. 11-18 (ukr).
Kozlov A. (1895), Consciousness of God and Knowledge of God. Remembrances on Ontological Argument, Voprosy Filosofii i Psikhologii, book 4 (29),Moscow, pp. 445-460 (rus).
MaksymovychI.(1861), From Translator [First Books Kіngdoms (Samuel)], in: Trudy Kiyevskoy Dukhovnoy Akadiemii, [iss.1], Kyiv, pp. І-ІІ (rus).
Novykova M. (1993), Ancient Ukrainian incantations: [foreword], in: Moskalenko M. Н. (edition), Ukrainski zamovliannia [Ukrainian incantations], Kyiv, pp. 7-29 (ukr).
Novytsky O. (1860), Gradual development of ancient philosophical theories in connection with the development heathen beliefs. Comp[osition] in 4 parts. [Introduction by the anonymous author, pp. V-XII], part 1: Religion and philosophy of Ancient Orient, V Universitetskoy Tipografii, Kyiv, 1860, ХV р. + 326 р. (rus).
Predko D. (2015), Specific peculiarities of religious feelings, in: Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu [Buleten University of Cherkasy]. «Philosophy» Series, iss. 11 (344), pp. 23-30 (ukr).
Chornomorets Y. (2013), Prospects of Religious Studies in the 21st Century. Philosophical Thoughts and Religious Studies Essays Round Table, in: Filosofska dumka, iss. 3, Kyiv, pp. 39-54 (ukr).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2016 Zуnovij Timenyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.