Confessional identity of Orthodox Ukrainians in the conditions of modern calls
Keywords:religious identity, denominational affiliation, ethnic and religious identity, Orthodox believer
The problems related to confessional identity of Orthodox Ukrainians in the conditions of modern calls are analysed in the article. Religious identification is a major mechanism of socialization and education of personality, that appears in realization by it own group belonging. The result of process of identification is an identity that is formed in intercommunication with confessional belonging. Connection of religious and ethnic identity is historically the inherent line of religious situation in Ukrainian society, where traditionally there was correlation between religious and ethnic belonging. Influence of ethnic descriptions unavoidable affects existence of religion, leads to forming of her certain features peculiar only to this ethnos.
A confessional identity actualized in the conditions when a religious identity envisages the concrete form of religiousness. Belonging to Orthodoxy appears the meaningful, valued painted marker of identification. Meaningfulness of confessional belonging grows in the conditions of deformation of social structures and institutes. In a situation with the Ukrainian Orthodox identity it is about the diffuse, vague identity, when an individual did not yet do a responsible world view choice, that is why image of his I characterized by fuzziness and vagueness. As a sign of confession is not acquires functions of basic identification, the nature of beliefs are mostly personal, when confessional identification is rather arbitrary.Self-declaration of identification with Orthodox confession largely has nominal character, predefined by perception of Orthodoxy as cultural tradition, and confessional belonging - as a contribution to this tradition. Self-identification with Orthodox confession is related to purposeful efforts of religious associations, and also with the process of equation of national and confessional self-identification. Belonging to Orthodox confession has symbolic character, demonstrates involvement of believing individual to the dominant ethnic and religious association.
Voropaieva T., Formation of national and religious identity of the citizens ofUkraine(1993-2010), available at: http://www.etnolog.org.ua/index.php?Itemid=58&id=107&option=com_content&task=view (ukr).
Ipatova L. P. (2008), Modern features of the development of the Orthodox tradition, in Tradition and innovation in contemporary Russia. Sociological analysis of the interaction and dynamics, ROSSPEN, Мoscow, pp. 7-67 (rus).
Pyatigorskiy A., National sovereignty as an object of phenomenology, available at: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2006/601 (rus).
"Religion and Power inUkraine: Problems of Relations". Materials of the Round table on "Church-state relations inUkraineas of 2013: Move to the partnership between the state and Church relations or to the crisis?", 22 April 2013, Razumkov Centre, Kyiv, 76 p. (ukr).
Smith Anthony D. (1994), National Identity, Foundations, Kyiv, 224 p. (ukr).
Tokareva T. V. (2003), The religious component authentication mechanisms in a transitive society, Abstract of thesis for the degree of candidate of sociological sciences in specialty 22.00.06 "Sociology of culture, spiritual life",Saratov, 24 р. (rus).
Ukraine 2014: Social and political conflict and the Church. The positions of religious leaders, experts and citizens (2014), Razumkov Centre, Kyiv, 28 p. (ukr).
Fylypovych L. O. (2010), Еthnic and religious identity: definition and conservation, in Ukrainske relihioznavstvo [Ukrain Religious], № 56, pp. 228-237 (ukr).
Huntington Samuel P. (2004), Who are we? Challenges toAmerica's National Identity, Publisher AST: Tranzitkniga, Мoscow, 635 p. (rus).
Chornomorets Yu., Modern problems of religious identity: the tragedy of Orthodoxy, available at: risu.org.ua/ua/index/monitoring/society_digest/42544/ (ukr).
Erikson E. (1996), Identity: Youth and Crisis, Publishing group "Progress", Мoscow, 344 p. (rus).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2016 Yuri Boreyko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.