Socioeconomic features of modernization of social relations on the principles of social responsibility

Authors

  • Yuliia Zaloznova Institute of Industrial Economics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2015.1(133).40056

Keywords:

socioeconomics, social responsibility, modernization, public attitudes, values, spirituality, trust, people, business, government

Abstract

The features of the formation of social responsibility on the basis socio-economics. Assess the degree of elaboration of this issue. Determine the need of modernization of public administration based on the results of the expert survey of scientists and educators. Justification of obstacles on the way to becoming a social responsibility of man, society, government, business. Public relations need to be modernized on formation of social responsibility of man, society and state. According to the expert survey scientists and educators on issues of social responsibility 85.4% of experts believe the irresponsibility of the prevailing system of social relations, and 79.8% were of the opinion lack of prestige Ukrainian society to be socially responsible person. Are defined motives initiate and stimulate the formation and development of social responsibility in the system of social relations based on socioeconomics.

On the first place among the priority levers of influence on the formation of social responsibility 62% of the experts have put the system of spiritual and moral education, family education. Generalization of obstacles becoming social responsibility of the state, society, business and the person identified low level of spiritual and moral culture of the ruling elite. Among the components of social responsibility, it was 63.3%, Ukrainian society - 51.3%, man - 52.5% of business - 30.4%. Motivation for the development of social responsibility in Ukraine are: the inevitability of punishment for violation of legal and moral norms, regardless of status (52.5%), revaluation of values aimed at improving the internal culture, human rights, agreements, requirements (47.5%) consolidation of business, government, science of socially significant problems (43.7%). Social responsibility socioeconomics context requires the development of values such as honor, dignity, commitment, reliability, prevention of risks and hazards, increased spiritual and moral level of trust and the development of social partnership.

Author Biography

Yuliia Zaloznova, Institute of Industrial Economics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Economics, Head of the sector socio-economic problems of the industrial development 

References

Zaloznova Yu. S. (2014), Socio-economic development of Ukraine in the context of global and national challenges, Institute of Industrial Economics, Kyiv, 336 p. (ukr).

Rykhter K. K., Pakhomova N. V. (2009), Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University, Series 5, Economy, Vol. 5, pр. 12-20 (rus).

Kanayeva O. A. (2010), Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University, Series 5, Economy, Vol. 5, pр. 25-33 (rus).

Deych M. Ye. Areas of corporate social responsibility in the context of socio-economic approach, available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/ 123456789/39829/14Deich.pdf?sequence=1.

Novikova O., Deych M., Pankova O. (2013), Diagnosis state and prospects of social responsibility in Ukraine (expert evaluation), NAN Ukrainy, Institute of Industrial Economics, Donetsk, 296 p. (ukr).

Deych M. Ye. (2014), The formation and development of multilevel system of social responsibility: administrative aspect, NAN Ukrainy, Institute of Industrial Economics, Donetsk, 352 p. (ukr).

Kolot A.M. [editor] (2012), Sustainability: Theory and Practice Development, KNEU, Kyiv, 501 p. (ukr).

Etzioni A. (2002), Socioeconomics: the next steps, available at: http://www.ecsoc.msses.ru/pdf/ecsoc_t3_nl.pdf.

Alesina A., Angeletos G.-M. (2005), Fairness and Redistribution, American Economic Review, Vol. 95, № 4, рр. 960-980 (engl).

Published

2015-03-31

How to Cite

Zaloznova, Y. (2015). Socioeconomic features of modernization of social relations on the principles of social responsibility. Skhid, (1(133). https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2015.1(133).40056

Issue

Section

Economy