Themes of Theosophy of Blavatsky and "Living Ethics" of Helena Roerich in Human Sciences: Between Religion and Oriental Studies
Keywords:Living Ethics Teaching, non-traditional religions, Oriental Studies, problematic, Religion Studies, Roerich Movement, Theosophy, Theosophical Movement
This article is dedicated to the theme of Theosophy and Living Ethics Teaching in modern Religion and Oriental Studies. So, in the article, the author surveys problems, which concerned with this theme and describes her condition in Religion and Oriental Studies and academic achievements, which was done for this theme. Essentially, discourse of the article focused on the contexts this theme in post-Soviet Religion Studies and Oriental Studies.
According the author's review, the problems for modern academic research of Theosophy and "Living Ethics" are next:
- Unascertained place of both teachings in modern classification of non-traditional religions. For demonstration, the author exemplifies various definitions of Theosophy and "Living Ethics" in classifications of non-traditional religions, which are suggested by modern Ukrainian and Russian researchers. He takes note, that in this classifications both teachings have a different and, sometimes, contradictory positions. For solution this problem, the author, however, suggests simply continuation the clearing of criterions for definition of both teachings.
- In whole, unsearched by academic tradition ideological content of Theosophy and "Living Ethics". Here, the author acknowledges absence a scientific works, which are dedicated to detail analysis both teachings, with their own philosophy, mythology and ethics. However, the author also admits, which such works may exist in Europe and America, but don't known in post-Soviet countries, because lack of informative connections between Western and post-Soviet sciences still not overcome completely. The author considers that theme of Theosophical and "Living Ethics" ideology as a perspective basis for analytic researches, both for Religion and Oriental Studies. In his opinion, one of these perspective trends is a sphere of comparative researches of Theosophy and "Living Ethics" ideology with ideology of those modern "New Age" teachings, which has connections with the Theosophy of Helena Blavatsky. The author suggests these researches for retrace the basic trends of development of Theosophical ideology and changes, which was caused by such development. For Oriental Studies the comparative researching trend, in the author opinion, also is perspective, because such research let to fix a discrepancy or similarity between Theosophical ideas, taken from Hinduism, Buddhism or Jainism and their Oriental prototypes.Also, the author marks the researching successes in sphere of historical studies of Theosophy and "Living Ethics". Exemplify this, he refers works of Western (like a Peter Washington, Kenneth Paul Johnson, James Webb and Maria Carlson) and Russian (like an Alexander Andreyev, Vladimir Rosov and Andrey Ignatyev) researchers, and constants that, thanks for these and similar works, the history of Theosophy and "Living Ethics" may be retraced very clear today.
Agni Yoga. The High Path, part I, available at: http://libes.ru/mobile/278903.read?page=292 (rus).
Andreyev A. I. (2008), The Himalayan Brotherhood: Theosophical Myth and his Creators, Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, 433 p. (rus).
Washington P. (1996), Madame Blavatsky's Baboon: A History of the Mystics, Mediums and Misfits Who Brought Spiritualism to America, Russian translation, available at: http://www.psylib.ukrweb.net/books/washi01/index.htm (rus).
Dudar N., Fylypovych L. (2000), A New Religious Streams: The Ukrainian Context, Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 132 p. (ukr).
Ignatyev A. (2012), The Myth of Mahatmas in Blavatsky's Theosophism, available at: http://www.psylib.ukrweb.net/books/washi01/index.htm (rus).
A New Religion of Ukraine (2010), History of Religion in Ukraine, Vol. 8, Kyiv, 828 p. (ukr).
Petryk V., Likhtenshtein Ye., Hrynko V., Levchenko S. (2000), Non-traditional Religions and Mystical Communities of Ukraine, Kyiv, 226 p. (ukr).
The Study of Religion, Textbook (2000), Vyshcha Shkola, Kyiv, 350 p. (ukr).
Webb J. (1990), The Occult Underground, Open Court, Chicago, 387 p. (engl).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2014 Anton Leshchynski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.