DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2020.1(165).222820

Metaphor as a development factor of the network society

Maria Schnitzer

Abstract


The formation of the methodological apparatus of network theory has been shown and the role of metaphor in the network society has been investigated to identify changes in reality and the emergence of new knowledge or a new variant of knowledge. It has been determined that thanks to metaphors, the paradigm of description of contemporary society has changed, which is now characterized as “network” or “web”, “flowing”, “dynamic”, “uneven” etc. The most famous attempts of such a description are the concept of new sociality by Z. Bauman and the actor-network theory by B. Latour. The latter allows considering the metaphor at the epistemological level of knowledge, i.e. in the processes of social construction. In this case, metaphors are used to build various kinds of metatheories that combine ways of substantiating and structuring knowledge about society, as well as determine the logical correlation of the main elements of analysis. An analysis of R. Haeussling’s network concept is given as an illustration of such possibilities of metaphor.


Keywords


network theory; network society; metaphor; metatheory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaya sovremennost (translat. from English). St.Petersburg: Piter, 240 p. (In Russian)

Capra, F. (2002). Pautina zhizni: Novoye nauchnoye ponimaniye zhivykh sistem. Moscow: Gelios. Retrieved from http://awake.kiev.ua/system/kapra.htm (In Russian).

Collins, R. (2002). Sotsiologiya filosofiy: globalnaya teoriya intellektualnogo izmeneniya (translat. from English). Novosibirsk. (In Russian).

Collins, R. (2009). Chetyrie sotsiologicheskikh traditsii (translat. from English). Moscow, 320 p. (In Russian)

Deleuze, J. & Guattari, F. (2010). Tysiacha plato. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya (translat. from English). Yekaterinburg, 895 p. (In Russian)

Durkheim, E. (1954). The elementary Forms of the Religions Life. Glencoe, P. 230-231.

Haeussling, R. (2003). Sotsiologicheskiye esse po osnovnym aspektam setevoy teorii (translat. from English). Мoscow, 192 p. (In Russian)

Lakoff, J. & Johnson, M. (2004). Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. (translat. from English). Moscow: Yeditorial URSS, 256 p. (In Russian).

Latour, B. (2006). Novogo vremeni ne bylo. Esse po simmetrichnoy antropologii (translat. from Franch). St.Petersburg: Izd-vo Yevrop. un-ta v S.-Peterburge, 240 p. (In Russian)

Simmel, G. (1996). Kak vozmozhno obshchestvo? (translat. from English). In: Izbrannoye. Vol.2. Moscow. 607 p. (In Russian)

Sivokon, A.S. (2016). Set: ot metafory k ontologicheskoy konstante. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriia Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. 1. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/set-ot-metafory-k-ontologicheskoy-konstante (In Russian)

Vasilkova, V. V. (2012). Seti v sotsialnom poznanii: ot metafory k metateorii. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii. № 5 (15). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/seti-v-sotsialnom-poznanii-ot-metafory-k-metateorii (In Russian).


GOST Style Citations








Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Schnitzer

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN 1728-9343 (Print)

ISSN 2411-3093 (Online)