Nataliia Reva


The article focuses on two things: the main difference between Critical thinking and Logic as the academic subjects and between Critical thinking and Logical thinking as two somehow similar, but nevertheless, diverse ways of rational thinking. The author stands that the false association of these two thinking manners influence on how both disciplines are taught. Unfortunately, in Ukraine, Critical thinking is neglected. Often Ukrainian universities replace it with some courses on Formal and Informal Logic. Furthermore, the existing Ukrainian manuals on Critical thinking are all devoted only to the logical issues. Although Logic can give some significant and useful tools, the author emphasizes that it is not sufficient for the correct usage of Critical thinking. Therefore, the author analyzes the main characteristics of Critical and Logical thinking. Using the table method, the authors indicate which features both thinking manners have in common and which are different for them. This table of comparison clearly demonstrates that Critical thinking and Logical thinking are not the same. Moreover, the author shows the roots of the established terminological misunderstanding in human society by studying the history of two subjects: Critical thinking and Informal Logic. Western science had already divided these disciplines and identified the main priorities and challenges for each. However, in Ukraine, we still have some “separation problems”, because of the glossary absence and the false association of two ways of rational thinking. To prove the declared similarity wrong the author studies two recently widespread fake news about COVID-19. The author debunks both COVID-myths by using different means given by Logic and Critical thinking showing that both of them can be used independently one of each other. The author stands that Critical Thinking is a very important skill, especially, during a pandemic time. Therefore, it is extremely important that it is taught and used in the correct manner.


Critical thinking; Logical thinking; Formal Logic; Informal logic; COVID-19

Full Text:



Bako, M. (2002). Why we need to teach logic and how can we teach it? International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from

Barber, S. (2015). Using Art to Teach Critical Thinking. Edutopia. Retrieved from

BBC. (2020a). 5G and coronavirus: Debunking the fake news stories. Retrieved from

BBC. (2020b). Will warm weather really kill off Covid-19? Retrieved from

Blair, J. A. (2011). Informal logic and its early historical development. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. Vol. 4(1): 1–16.

Bondar, V. I., Yacenko, T. S. (2019). Сritical intelligence in social, scientific, and educational knowledge. Science notes: Series pedagogical sciences. Issue СХХХХІІ (142): 5-16. (in Ukrainian)

Bowen, D., Greene, J., Kisida, B. (2014). Learning to Think Critically: A Visual Art Experiment. Educational Researcher, 43(1): 37-44. DOI:

Chuba, O. (2013). Forming of Critical Thinking as Psychological and Pedagogical Problem of Contemporaneity. Pedagogy and psychology of vocational education. № 3: 202-208. (in Ukrainian)

Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Lexington, Mass: D.C. Heath. Retrieved from

Epp, S. (1996). A Cognitive Approach to Teaching Logic and Proof. In DIMACS Symposium on Teaching Logic and Reasoning in an Illogical World, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.

Fisher, A., Scriven, M. (1997) Critical Thinking. Its Definition and Assessment. Edgepress: CA, USA/Centre For Research in Critical Thinking. Norwich, UK. 228 p.

Geach, P. (1979). On teaching logic. Philosophy, Vol. 54, № 207: 5-17.

Glaser, E. (1941). An Experiment in the Development of Critical Thinking. Advanced School of Education Teacher’ College, Columbia. 212 p.

Groarke, L. (2017). Informal Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from:

Halpern, D. F. (2007). The Nature of Nurture of Critical Thinking. In Critical thinking in Psychology: 1-15. Ed. by Sternberg, R. J., Roediger, H. L. III, Halpern, D. F. DOI:

Hitchcock, D. (2017). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. In book: On Reasoning and Argument: 477-497. DOI:

Hughes, G.E., Schagrin, M. L. (2018). Formal logic. Encyclopedia Britannica, inc. Retrieved from

Johnson, R. H. (2012). When Informal Logic Met Critical Thinking. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, Vol.

(3): 5-14. DOI:

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 4: 71-115. DOI:

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York. 499 p.

Khomenko, I. (2020). Jerome Bosch through the focus of critical thinking. Retrieved from

Konverskiy, A. (2020). Critical thinking. Textbook for students of higher education institutions of all specialties. 344 p.

Kovic, M. (2016). A generalized definition of critical thinking. Swiss Skeptics. Discussion Paper Series 1(1): 1-31. DOI: 10.31235/

Paul, R., Elder, L. (2006). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. The Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved from

Simon, H. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1: 99-118. DOI:

The ASEAN Post Team (2020). COVID-19: Facts And Fakes. In The ASEAN Post. Retrieved from

Tiaglo, O. (2008) Critical thinking. Publishing group: "Osnovi", PE "Triada +". Kharkiv. 187 p. (in Ukrainian)

Ushchapovska, A. V. (2013). The problem of identifying the concept of critical thinking. Retrieved from: (In Ukrainian)

Van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E., Henkemans, F., Verheijc, B., Wagemans, J. (2013). Informal Logic. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht: 1-45. DOI:

Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking. Why Is It So Hard to Teach? AMERICAN EDUCATOR. Vol. 31(3): 8-19. DOI:

GOST Style Citations

Copyright (c) 2020 Nataliia Reva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN 1728-9343 (Print)

ISSN 2411-3093 (Online)