Archetypical approach to activity: legitimation by practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2020.1(165).196777Keywords:
archetype, archetypal approach, activity, branding, role, pedagogy, diplomacyAbstract
Modern reality needs to be put into practice, asserted as a program of practical activity by newly developed theoretically approaches, among which the archetypal approach seems to be one of the most promising, since it takes into account the real motives of the actors as subjects. The features of the archetypal approach to activities in certain spheres of social practice from the point of view of realization in everyday life, and not only in theory, are highlighted in the article. Thus, examples of the application of the archetypal approach in marketing practice, in particular branding, in pedagogical practice and in the practice of political diplomacy, are considered. The importance of taking into account the archetypal tendency of the objects of influence in these spheres and the construction of an adequate scheme of activity, including on these principles, is emphasized. An extensive list of individual archetypal classifications is given, archetypes and roles differentiated. The model of the twelve archetypes of M. Mark and KS Pearson was used as a methodological base, among which the types "Simple", "Glorious Small", "Careful", "Creator", "Sage", "Seeker", "Rebel", "Clown", "Hero", "Mage", "Ruler". The difference between the content of the outlook of these archetypes is exemplified by their actual or potential legitimation in the practice of branding, pedagogy and diplomacy. The author uses Ukrainian realities, in particular, conducts an archetypal analysis of diplomatic negotiations between the leadership of Russia and the heads of European states over the end of the war in eastern Ukraine. We propose our own assessment of the reasons for the ineffectiveness of such negotiations in terms of archetypal approach. An overview of the achievements of modern Ukrainian scientists in the direction of legitimizing the archetypal approach in different spheres of practice is given.References
Afonin, E. & Martynov, A. (2013). Archetype and social: interaction and mutual influences. Public administration: theory and practice. Special Issue: 193-200. (In Ukrainian)
Afonin, E. A. (ed.), Ryabtsev, G. L. (ed.) (2015). Arkhetypika i derzhavne upravlinnya: hromadyanska samoorhanizatsiya, sotsialna mobilnist, suspilna intehratsya. Kyiv: Psycheya, 84 p. (In Ukrainian)
Arpentyeva, M. R. & Braitseva, S. V. (2018). Archetypes and role models in visual branding. Znak: problemnoye pole mediaobrazovaniya, 2 (28). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/arhetipy-i-rolevye-modeli-v-vizualnom-branding (In Russian)
Belekhova, L. I. (2015). Arkhetyp, arkhetypnyy smysl, arkhetypnyy obraz u linhvokohnityvnomu vysvitlenni (na materiali virshovanykh tekstiv amerykanskoyi poeziyi). Bulletin of the Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. Ser.: Philological Sciences (Linguistics). 3: 6-16. (In Ukrainian)
Berne, E. (2016). Igry, v kotoryye igrayut lyudi [Games that people play]. Nyköping (Sweden): Philosophical Archives, 164 p. (In Russian)
Butyrina, M. V. (2013). Do pytannya zastosuvannya arkhetypiv u komunikatsiyniy praktytsi. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University. Social Communications Series, 13: 13-17 (In Ukrainian).
Demchuk, R. V. (2018). Mythopoetics as a Means of Modeling Ukrainian Identity: A Cultural-Civilizational Context (Candidat's thesis, Absrtact). Tchaikovsky National Music Academy. Kyiv, 34 p. (In Ukrainian)
Donchenko, O. A. (2012). Arkhetypovyy menedzhment. Kirovograd: Imex-LTD, 264 p. (In Ukrainian)
Donchenko, Olena and Romanenko, Yuriy (2001). Arkhetypy sotsialnoho zhyttya i polityka (Hlybynni rehulyatyvy psykhopolitychnoho povsyakdennya). Kyiv: Libid, 334 p. (In Ukrainian)
Dubnichenko, V. J. (2005). Specific character of Orthodox archetype reflection in Russian metaphysic tradition. (Candidat's thesis, Absrtact). Donetsk National University, 20 p. (In Ukrainian)
Kazimiriv, H. (2013). Arkhetyp, kontsept i mifolohema v systemi muzychnykh katehoriy. Bulletin of the Carpathian University: Art Studies. 28-29, part 1. Ivano-Frankivsk: 190-195. (In Ukrainian)
Kovalchuk, N. D. (2007). Symbolic Structures of the Ethnocultural Process in Ukraine (Doctor's thesis). Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of NAS Ukraine, 404 p. (In Ukrainian)
Kovtun, N. M. (2009). Arkhetyp yak invariantna forma dukhovnoho zhyttya. Materials of the Scientific and Methodological Seminar. Retrieved from http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/6256/1/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%82%D1%83%D0%BD%20%D0%9D%20%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%20%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82.pdf (In Ukrainian)
Kozhemyakina, O. M. (2012). Arkhetypni zasady komunikatyvnykh praktyk manipulyuvannya doviroyu. Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the Association of Doctors of Science in Public Administration: Special Issue. Kharkiv, рр. 263-272. (In Ukrainian)
Kravchenko, A. A. (2013). Arkhetyp uchytelya: ideya, obraz, vidpovidalnist. Lviv: Liga Press, 421 p. (In Ukrainian)
Los, Julia (2019). How to use the archetype method in branding. Retrieved from https://yulialos.com/archetypes/kak-ispolzovat/ (In Russian)
Mark, M. and Pearson, K. (2005). Geroy i buntar [Hero and Rebel]. St. Petersburg: Peter, 336 p. (In Russian)
Medinska, Julia (2004). Kolektyvne nesvidome yak hlybynna determinanta etnichnoho mentalitetu. Psychology and society. 2: 50-117. (In Ukrainian)
Nekita, A. G. (2001). Mechanisms of unconscious social distortion of the archetype phenomenology. (Candidat's thesis, Absrtact). Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of NAS Ukraine. Kyiv, 16 p. (In Ukrainian)
Nikolova, O. (2014). Providni oriyentyry porivnyalnykh studiy typolohiyi psevdomorfnykh personazhiv. Humanities education in technical higher education institutions. 30: 178-193. (In Ukrainian)
Polikanova, A. V. (2012). Vykorystannya teoriyi arkhetypiv u praktytsi brendynhu. Retrieved from https://clck.ru/MBNMG (In Ukrainian)
Publichnoye upravleniye: teoriya i praktika (2010). Collection of scientific works of the Association of Doctors of Sciences on Public Administration, 3-4. Kharkiv, 432 p. (In Russian)
Radchenko, O. and Kriukov, O. (2014). Derzhavna molodizhna polityka: osnovni ponyattya ta pryntsypy yak arkhetypy formuvannya ta realizatsiyi v publichnomu prostori. Public administration: theory and practice: 142-147 (In Ukrainian).
Romankova, L. M. (2015). Tsinnisno-smyslova determinatsiya v osvitniomu prostori vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu. Nova paradyhma, 108: 193-202. (In Ukrainian)
Severynova, M. (2012). Arkhetypovi obrazy sakralnoho na prykladi kontsertu №3 dlya fortepiano, strunnoho orkestru ta velykoho barabana M. Skoryka. Kultura Ukrayiny, 39: 12-22. (In Ukrainian)
Sohan, L. V. (2019). Review of the monograph by E.Afonin and A.Martinov "The Ukrainian Miracle: From Depression to Social Optimism". Retrieved from http://publish-ukma.kiev.ua/ua/recenziyi/68-recenziya-na-monografiyu-afonina.html
Sushyy, Olena (2013). Sotsialnyy dialoh u fokusi arkhetypnoyi paradyhmy. Public Management: Theory and Practice: 252-256. (In Ukrainian)
Tikhovska, O. (2015). Personifikatsiya arkhetypu Tini u mifolohichnomu svitohlyadi ukrayintsiv. Modern Problems of Linguistics and Literary Studies: Issue 20: 130-135. (In Ukrainian)
Uris, T. (2016). Arkhetyp yak estetychna dominanta khudozhnioho vyrazhennya modusu natsionalnoyi identychnosti v suchasniy ukrayinskiy poeziyi. Uzhgorod University Scientific Bulletin. Series: Philology. 1: 96-100. (In Ukrainian)
Yung, K.-G. (1996). Dusha i mif: shest arkhetipov [Soul and Myth: Six Archetypes]. Kyiv: State Book of Literature for Adolescence, 384 p. (In Russian)
Zakrevsky, V. E. (2002). The Artetype of the Perfect Man as a Phenomenon of Public Consciousness. (Candidat's thesis, Absrtact). Ushinsky South Ukrainian State pedagogical university. Odessa, 19 p. (In Ukrainian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Alla Makarova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
