Axiological portrait of information society




networked society, virtual, axiological information, infologem, hedonism


The urgency of the issue is determined by an extent social discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of information process itself and application to the diverse social spheres, its problems and threatens. The main range of the problems is connected with the constant transformation and social variability, consequently with a change of worldview’s field of a person. The advantages of information society are traditionally connected with the constant development, creativity, freedom and discoveries of new ways of personal realization and communication possibilities. According to a principle of post-non-classical methodology, the authors study a problem of the value transformations in conditions of information society and determine the crucial contexts of infosociogenesis: a context of networked coordination, ethical context and symbolic context (namely, virtualization and mythologizing of information space). The realities of modern society form various even diametrically opposed values that lead to complete devaluation of each value and deprive a worldview of its principle of consolidation are considered in the issue. The authors describe the mechanisms of pe rson’s networked coordination and demonstrate that their action (constructive and destructive) facilitates in the general process of experience enrichment which is gained via a multiplicity and simultaneity of virtual practices in different spheres (simuclarization) and often mistakenly presented as a real experience of a person. The ethical transformations of information society are considered to be closely connected with an issue of personal social stability which is not often aware of the freedom limits in information space. The symbolic context of infosociogenesis in the form of virtualization and mythologizing is characterized by the creation and social inquiry of cultural forms which are produced by virtual patterns of the reality (simulacrums).

Author Biographies

Oleksander Dzeban, Yaroslav Mudry National Academy of Law

Doctor of philosophical science, professor, professor of the department of philosophy

Olena Aleksandrova, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Doctor of philosophical science

Nataliia Vinnikova, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Doctor of philological science


Antonenko, T., Chursin, M. (2019). On the Eve of the Future: the Values Sign Change. Philosophy and Cosmology (Filosofiya i kosmologiya), 23: 82-91.

Baeva, L. V. (2014). Antinomies of Values under Conditions of Information Age. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Evolving Issues Surrounding Technoethics and Society in the Digital Age (pp. 198-212). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI:

Brin, D. (1998). The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom? Perseus, Reading, MA

Castells, M. (2000). Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kultura (The Information Age: Economics, Society and Culture). Moscow: GU HSE, 608 p. (In Russian)

Castells, M. (2007). Internet-galaktyka. Mirkuvannya shchodo Internetu, biznesu i suspilstva (Internet galaxy. Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society). Kyiv: Vyd-vo “Vakler”, 304 p. (In Ukrainian)

Chiriac, H. C. (2013). Scientific and Religious Imaginary in the Knowledge Society. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(1), 111-122. Retrieved from

Danylian, O. H., Dzeban, O. P., Zhdanenko, S. B. and other (2018). Suspilstvo, lyudyna, pravo: dosvid filosofsko-pravovoho osmyslennya. Kharkiv: Pravo, 350 p. (In Ukrainian)

Dzeban, O. P. (2013). Sotsialni perspektyvy genezy informatsiynykh protsesiv. Hileya: naukovyy visnyk, 74 (№ 7): 167-169. (In Ukrainian)

Dzeban, O. P. (2014). Manipulyatyvnyy kharakter informatsiynoho seredovyshcha suchasnoho suspilstva. Informatsiya i pravo. 3 (12): 3-12. (In Ukrainian)

Dzeban, O. P. and Zhdanenko, S. B. (2013). Do problemy moralno-etychnykh aspektiv informatsiynoho suspilstva. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Yurydychna akademiya Ukrayiny imeni Yaroslava Mudroho». Seriya: Filosofiya, filosofiya prava, politolohiya, sotsiolohiya, 5 (19): 104-114. (In Ukrainian)

Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fomin, M. V. (2018). Transindustrialism-Upcoming Social Reality. Voprosy filosofii, (1), 42-54.

Fuchs, C., Bichler, R. M., & Raffl, C. (2009). Cyberethics and co-operation in the information society. Science and engineering ethics, 15(4), 447. DOI:

Gellman, R. (2005). The digital person: Technology and privacy in the information age. Government information quarterly, 22 (3): 530-532. DOI:

Guogis, A. (2010). To refrain from capitalism or to improve it? The importance of equity during crisis. FILOSOFIJA-SOCIOLOGIJA, 21(2), 83-91.

Harris, John. (2007). Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton University Press, Princeton-NJ.

Husyev, A. A. (2012). Nebezpeky, sformovani v suspilstvi za rakhunok rozvytku informatsiynykh tekhnolohiy. Biznes Inform. 4: 72-75. (In Ukrainian)

Ihnatenko, V. (2011). Samotniy kvazisubyekt u epokhu postmodernu: krytyka hlobalizovanoho suspilstva. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiynoho universytetu. Seriya: Filosofiya. Kulturolohiya, 2: 88-93. (In Ukrainian)

Ivanov, D. V. (2002). Virtualizatsiya obshchestva: Versiya 2.0. St.Petersburg: PV, 224 p. (In Russian)

Karpovets, M. (2013). Tilo, moda, identychnist: postmoderni konfihuratsiyi. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiya». Filosofiya. 2013. Issue. 14: 156-160. (In Ukrainian)

Kogan, V.Z. (1993). Kachestvo informatsii i mir infologem (fragmenty teorii). In: Problemy informatsionnogo vzaimodeystviya. Novosibirsk, 10-39. (In Russian)

Korableva, E. (2015). Freedom of the information space. Is it a reality or illusion? Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 7, 124-129. DOI:

Kulya, A. E. (2016). Informatsiyne suspilstvo yak produkt rozvytku informatsiynykh tekhnolohiy. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriya: Sotsialni komunikatsiyi, 3: 36-39. (In Ukrainian)

McLuhan, M. (2005). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Becoming of the Human Print. Moscow: Academic Project, 495 p. (In Russian)

Savchenko, A. A. (2011). Postmodernizm yak sotsiokulturne yavyshche. Visnyk Kharkivskoyi derzhavnoyi akademiyi kultury. Issue 33: 196-202. (In Ukrainian)

Shaff, A. (1995). Kuda vedet doroga? In: Filosofiya istorii. Antologiya. Mosow: Aspekt-Press, pp. 311-321. (In Russian)

Shkil, L. L. (2015). Tilotsentryzm yak nove yavyshche Postmodernu. Hileya: naukovyy visnyk. Issue 94: 169-172. (In Ukrainian)

Sitkevich, N. V. (2011). Osobennosti transformatsii nravstvennykh tsennostey v usloviyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva. Novomoskovsk, 139 p. (In Russian)

Spence, Edward H. (2011). Information, knowledge and wisdom: groundwork for the normative evaluation of digital information and its relation to the good life. Ethics and Information technology, 13: 261-275. DOI:

Stock, G. (2003). Redesigning humans: Choosing our children's genes. Profile Books, London, UK.

Toynbee, A. J. (1996). Postizheniye istorii (Understanding History). Moscow: Progress: Kultura, 606 p. (In Russian)

Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the End Times. London: Verso, 416 p.




How to Cite

Dzeban, O., Aleksandrova, O., & Vinnikova, N. (2019). Axiological portrait of information society. Skhid, (5(163), 13–19.



Social Philosophy