Organizational culture study as the system element of internal business communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2019.3(161).171965Keywords:
organizational culture, global and local dimensions, classification, cultural paradigm of an organization, organizational communicationsAbstract
The issue is devoted to the study of modern processes in the sphere of decision-making and organizational communicational systems building. The complex analysis of organizational culture as a component of social culture, system of values and beliefs, which determined personnel’s behavior model and conditioned the general character of organization existence is performed. In particular, applying to comparative and critical analysis of various concept definitions of “organizational culture” and revealing the advantages of social and cultural approach as a platform for social structures analysis which formed value background for managerial decisions, the author considers organizational culture as a base for effective managerial decisions-making; defines the main classification principles of organizational culture; determines the structure on the ground of three-level conception: “surfaced”, “beneath surface” and “deep” levels, which form “cultural paradigm” of an organization and coherent image. Furthermore, the typical internal components of organizational culture are highlighted and analyzed. Addressing the following objectives provides an opportunity, firstly, to organize social and philosophical concepts’ analysis of organizational culture on global and local levels, whereas each relates to a special tool standard used within social and communication analysis; secondly, to define specific features’ selection of organizational culture’s influential factors on managerial decisions creation and their mechanisms of implementation. The crucial conclusions are: mutual connection determination between 1) the types of social structure and the peculiarities of organizational activity; 2) the classification features of organizational culture and intentions of managerial decisions; 3) levels of organizational culture and organizational values positioning; 4) a personal type and his ability to accept and transmit the fundamental achievements of organizational culture.References
Aleksandrova, O. S. (2015). Korporatyvna kultura yak chynnyk stanovlennya i rozvytku suchasnoho universytetu. Neperervna profesiyna osvita: teoriya i praktyka. (3), 21-26 (In Ukrainian).
Aleksandrova, O., Batchenko, L., Dielini, M., Lavryk, U. (2018). Specifics of Managing Competitiveness of Present-day University on Principles of Social Responsibility. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu (Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University), (4), 157-165. (In English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-4/21
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sotsialnoye prostranstvo i genezis klassov. Sotsiologiya politiki: (translat., ed. by N. A. Shmatko). Moscow: Socio-logos, 329 p. (In Russian)
Bourdieu, P. (2005). Sotsialnoye prostranstvo: polya i praktiki Мoscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy. Retrieved from http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3707/3708 (In Russian)
Harris, D. L. and Moran, R. T. (1987). Managing cultural differences [2nd ed.]. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company, 431 p. (In English)
Hall, E T. and Hall, M. R. (1989). Understanding Cultural Differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, 320 p. (In English)
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2 ed.). Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 358 р. (In English)
Temnitskiy, A. L. (2007). Issledovatelskiye vozmozhnosti kategorii "sotsiokulturnost'". Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody i matematicheskoye modelirovaniye. (24), 73-84. (In Russian)
Schein, E. (2002). Organizatsionnaya kultura i liderstvo: Postroyeniye, evolyutsiya, sovershenstvovaniye (translat. from English). St.Petersburg: Piter, 336 p. (In Russian)
Dyachenko, T. O. (2009). Zahalni pidkhody pry vprovadzhenni zmin orhanizatsiynoyi kultury. Formuvannya rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukrayini. 8 (99), 116-119. (In Ukrainian)
Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). Multiculturalism and intergroup relations: psychological implications for democracy in global context. American Psychological Association. Washington, DC, 207 p. (In English)
Kozlovets, M. A. (2011). Natsionalna identychnist yak sotsiokulturnyy fenomen. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. (60), 3-11. (In Ukrainian)
Solomanidina, T. O. (2003). Organizatsionnaya kultura kompanii. Moscow: Upravleniye personalom, 455 p. (In Russian)
Shironina, Ye. M. (2013). Teoretiko-metodicheskiy podkhod k klassifikatsii faktorov formirovaniya i razvitiya organizatsionnoy kultury. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo. № 12-2(41). Pp. 891-896. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20932132 (In English)
Lewis, R. D. (2006). When Cultures Collide: Leading Across Cultures. Boston-London: Nicholas Brealey International, Retrieved from http://www.utntyh.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/When-Cultures-Collide.pdf (In English)
Triandis, H. & McCuster, С. & Hui, C. (1990). Multimethod Probes of Individualism and Collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 59. № 5, 106-120. (In English)
Yoshimura, N. and Anderson, P. (1997). Inside the Keisha: Demystifying Japanese Business Behavior. Harvard Business School Press, 259 p. (In English)
Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (In English)
Handy, Ch. (2008). Budushcheye krupnykh korporatsiy i melkogo biznesa. Moscow: Alpina Biznes Buks, 356 s. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Liudmyla Kompaniiets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
