DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2019.3(161).171718

Constitution of social reality: from “lebenswelt” of Husserl to Garfinkel’s “practical thinking”

Anastasia Kosinska

Abstract


The issue is devoted to the possibilities of social reality’s interpretations. Edmund Husserl’s and Alfred Schutz’s conceptions of “lifeworld” are analyzed as well as a place of common life in Harold Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology. The author highlights the exceptional role of social order constitution in social phenomenology. Social reality, its definitions and characteristics play a crucial role in development of humanitarian science. Understanding of social reality is fundamental for social and phenomenological directions of modern philosophy; nevertheless the issue has not had sufficient theoretical considerations in Ukraine. The aim of the issue was to determine the ways of social reality’s constitution within the works of Husserl, Schutz and Garfinkel. The constitutional ways of social reality were systematically analyzed for the first time at the work form Husserl’s conception through Schutz’s philosophy to Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology. As a result the characteristics of social reality were determined in phenomenological and ethnomethodological studies. Moreover, it was pioneering to demonstrate history and transformational changes in social reality understanding from “lifeworld” in phenomenology to “practical thinking” in ethnomethodology. The presented work, based on Ukrainian and Western scientific studies and original sources, offers the main conclusions about characteristics of social reality in the abovementioned works. Theoretical value of a study refers to the further scientific thought development about phenomenology, ethnomethodology as well as to the fundamental meaning of social reality for these spheres. Practical value of a study affects the opportunities to apply the defined features of social reality and its constitution to practical activity.

Keywords


society; phenomenology; social order; constitution; lifeworld; ethnomethodology; pre scientific knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


American sociological thought: Texts. (1994). Moscow: Moscow State University. (In Russian)

Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas (1995). The Social Construction of Reality (transl.) Moscow: Medium, 323 p. (In Russian)

Bystrytsky, Ye. (2012). Transtsendentalna fenomenolohiya i ponyattya dosvidu. Filosofska dumka, №5. Pp. 113-132. (In Ukrainian)

Cooley, Charles Horton (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: C. Scribner's sons. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/humannaturesocia00cooluoft/page/x

Garfinkel, H. (2002). What is Ethnomethodology? In: Garfinkel, H., Rawls, A. W. (ed.). Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Рp. 91-99. (In English)

Garfinkel, Harold (2005). Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996867.

Husserl, Edmund (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy, Northwestern University Press. (In English)

Kebuladze, V. I. (1998). Intersubyektyvne vchennya E. Husserlya yak transtsendentalnyy fon fenomenolohichnoyi kontseptsiyi dosvidu A. Shyutsa: Avtoref. dys… k.filos.n.: 09.00.05. Kyyiv: KNU, 1998. Retrieved from http://cheloveknauka.com/intersubektivnoe-uchenie-e-gusserlya-kak-tarnstsendentalnyy-fon-fenomenologicheskoy-kontseptsii-opyta-a-shyutsa#ixzz5rNdUBQw3

Kenneth, Allan (2005). Explorations in classical sociological theory: seeing the social world. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press. p. 314 (In English)

Kosharnyy, S. O. (2005). Fenomenolohichna kontseptsiya filosofiyi E. Huserlya: krytychnyy analiz. Kyiv: Ukrayinskyy tsentr dukhovnoyi kultury (In Ukrainian).

Kotsyuba, Maksym (2017). Fenomenolohichna filosofiya: vid «dosvidu Inshoho» do «dosvidu etychnoho». Filosofska dumka, №5. pp. 90-98. (In Ukrainian)

Parsons, Talcott (2002). The Structure of Social Action (translat. from English). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt (In Russian)

Proleev, S. (2009). Profetyzm modernoyi nimetskoyi filosofiyi: K. Marks i E. Husserl. Filosofska dumka, №1. Pp. 125-133. (In Ukrainian)

Prychepiy, Ye. M. (1971). Fenomenolohichna teoriya svidomosti E. Husserlya. Krytychnyy narys. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1971 (In Ukrainian)

Ricoeur, Paul (1967). Husserl. An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press. (In English)

Schutz, Alfred, and Luckmann, Thomas (1974). The Structures of the Life-World. (Strukturen der Lebenswelt.) Translated by Richard M. Zaner and H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (In English)

Shyuts, A. (2003). Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoy sotsiologii. Moscow: Institute of the Fund "Public opinion" (In Russian)

Simmel, Georg. (1996). Izbrannoye: Tom 2. Sozertsaniye zhizni. Moscow: Yurist, 608 p. (In Russian)

Vom Lehn, D. (2014). Harold Garfinkel. New York: Routledge, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315427652


GOST Style Citations


Allan Kenneth. Explorations in classical sociological theory: seeing the social world. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press. 2005, p. 314.

 

Garfinkel Harold. Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.

 

Husserl Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy, 1970.

 

Ricoeur Paul. Husserl. An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University, 1967.

 

Schutz Alfred, Luckmann Thomas. The Structures of the Life-World. (Strukturen der Lebenswelt.) Translated by Richard M. Zaner and H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

 

Vom Lehn, Dirk: Harold Garfinkel: The Creation and Development of Ethnomethodology. Left Coast Press, 2014.

 

Американская социологическая мысль: Тексты. Москва: МГУ, 1994.

 

Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Москва: Academia-Центр; Медиум, 1995. 323 с.

 

Бистрицький Є. Трансцендентальна феноменологія і поняття досвіду. Філософська думка, 2012. №5. С. 113-132.

 

Гарфинкель Г. «Что такое этнометодология». Социологическое обозрение. 2012. Т. 11., №3. URL: https://sociologica.hse.ru/­data/2013/01/17/1302903565/11_3_13.pdf (дата звернення 12.03.2019)

 

Зиммель Г. Избранное: Том 2. Созерцание жизни. Москва: Юрист, 1996. 607 с.

 

Коцюба Максим. Феноменологічна філософія: від «досвіду Іншого» до «досвіду етичного». Філософська думка. 2017. №5. С. 90-98.

 

Кошарний С. О. Феноменологічна концепція філософії Е. Гусерля: критичний аналіз. Київ: Український центр духовної культури, 2005.

 

Кули Ч. Человеческая природа и социальный порядок. Москва: Идея-Пресс, 2000.

 

Пролеєв С. Профетизм модерної німецької філософії: К. Маркс і Е. Гусерль. Філософська думка. 2009. №1. С. 125-133.

 

Шюц А. Смысловая структура повседневного мира: очерки по феноменологической социологии. Москва: Ин-т Фонда «Общественное мнение», 2003.

 

Парсонс Т. О структуре социального действия. Москва: Академический проект, 2002. 880 с.

 

Причепій Є. М. Феноменологічна теорія свідомості Е. Гуссерля. Критичний нарис. Київ: Наукова думка, 1971.

 

Кебуладзе В. І. Інтерсуб’єктивне вчення Е. Гуссерля як трансцендентальний фон феноменологічної концепції досвіду А. Шюца: автореф. дис. … к. філос. н.: 09.00.05. Київ: КНУ, 1998. URL: http://cheloveknauka.com/intersubektivnoe-uchenie-e-gusserlya-kak-tarnstsendentalnyy-fon-fenomenologicheskoy-kontseptsii-opyta-a-shyutsa#ixzz5rNdUBQw3






Copyright (c) 2019 Anastasia Kosinska

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN 1728-9343 (Print)

ISSN 2411-3093 (Online)