“The hard problem” of consciousness in the light of phenomenology of аrtificial intelligence
Keywords:artificial intelligence, physical, mental, qualia, human body, ethics
Purpose: The widest use of artificial intelligence technologies tends to uncontrolled growth. At the same time, in modern scientific thought there is no adequate understanding of the consequences of the introduction of artificial intelligence in the daily life of a person as its irremovable element. In addition, the very essence of what could be called the “thinking” of artificial intelligence remains the philosophical Terra Incognita. However, it is precisely the features of the flow of intelligent machine processes that, both from the point of view of intermediate goals, and in the sense of final results, can pose serious threats. Modeling the “phenomenology of AI” leads to the need to reformulate the central questions of the philosophy of consciousness, such as the “difficult problem of consciousness”, and require the search for ways and means of articulation of the “human dimension” of reality for AI.Theoretical basis. The study is based on a phenomenological methodology, which is used in the model of artificial thinking. The implementation of Artificial Intelligence technologies is not accompanied by the development of a philosophy of human coexistence and AI. The algorithms underlying the activities of currently existing intellectual technologies do not guarantee that their intermediate and final results comply with ethical criteria. Today, one should ponder over nature and the purpose of separating physical reality in the primary for our Self mental stream. Originality of the research lies in the fact that the solution to the "hard problem of consciousness" is connected with the interpretation of qualia as the representation of the "physical" as related to bodily states. From this point of view, the resolution of the "hard problem of consciousness" can be associated with the interpretation of qualia as the representation of the "physical". In the "thinking process" of AI it is necessary to apply restrictions related to the fixation of the metaphysical meaning of the human body with precisely human parameters. Conclusions. It is necessary to take a different look at the connection between thinking and purposeful action, including due action, which means to look at ethics differently. “The basis of universal law” will then consist (including for AI), on the one hand, of preserving the parameters of material processes that are necessary for human existence, and on the other, of maintaining the integrity of that semantic universe, in relation to which certain senses only exist.
Andler, Daniel (2007). Phenomenology in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science. In: Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 377-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996508.ch26 (In English).
Beavers, Anthony F. (2002). Phenomenology and Artificial Intelligence. Metaphilosophy. Vol. 33, Issue1-2: 70-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00217 (In English).
Bilokobylskyi, O. (2018). Alhorytmy lyudskoyi svidomosti yak proobraz formuvannya svidomosti shtuchnoyi. Nauka. Relihiya. Suspilstvo. (Science. Religion. Society). No. 1: 107-112 (In Ukrainian).
Boddington, P. (2017). Introduction: Artificial Intelligence and Ethics. In: Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4_1 (In English).
Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. Issue 2 (3), P. 200-219 (In English).
Kissinger, H. (2018). How the Enlightenment Ends. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/ (Accessed: 25.01.19).
Rábová, I., Konečný, V., Matiášová, A. (2005). Decision making with support of artificial intelligence. Agric. Econ. Czech, 51: 385-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/5124-AGRICECON (In English).
Rayhert, K. (2018). The philosophical issues of the idea of conscious machines. Skhid, 6(152), 104-107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2017.6(152).122367 (In English).
Vasiliev, V. (2009). Trudnaya problema soznaniya. Progress-Tradition. Moscow: 272 p. (In Russian).
Vetushinskiy, A. (2016). Tri interpretatsii naslediya Tyuringa: imenem chego yavlyayetsya iskusstvennyy intellekt? Filosofskaya mysl. 11 (11): 22-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8728.2016.11.21046 (In Russian).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Oleksandr Bilokobylskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.