Social and cultural complex of Рrykarpattya village in the second half the XX century

Authors

  • Roman Vеprіv Ivano-Frankivsk Branch Institute of History of Ukraine, NAS of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2013.3(123).15222

Keywords:

social and residential complex, education, culture, health care, construction, village

Abstract

 Entire description of social-economic operations, which took place on the west Ukrainian lands in the XX century, is fed in investigations of: N. Zhulkanych, H. Kryvchyck, M. Lendiel, O. Maliarchuk,S. Padalka, S. Tym­chenka etc.

 In this article it was proved that dealing with social issues were achieved significant successes-in addition to improving the living conditions significantly increased the level of cultural and consumer services. Along with the welfare of people were resolved urgent issues of everyday life. In this area occurred major changes, in despite of the lagging of the highly developed countries of the world and other regions of the republic - material well-being of the most residents significantly improved. For the development of social areas of the village the most favorable period of the study time period was the second half of 60-70 years of the XX century. In these years were canceled their labor days in the collective farms and was made the transition to guaranteed wage, farmers began to receive pensions and vacations, so their social status equaled to other categories of Soviet society. In rural areas, while in insufficient quantities, were constructed houses for young professionals, schools, orphanages, kindergartens, medical points, clubs, libraries, household objects, baths, shops, cafeterias, administrative offices of village councils, post offices, bus stations, were conducted gasification, telephones.

 Were analyzed the material conditions of life, they were based on salary, speaking along with gardens, the main source of replenishment of the family budget. Thus, the wage rates of workers, technical staff and employees differed significantly from the meager wages of workers. Minimum income of the rural population involved in the collective and state farms, led to its low purchasing power. Gradual increase in remuneration collective farmers significantly affected the well-being of people.

 In turn, this gave grounds to confirm the thesis of "parental care" state of rural workers strongly supported by the party propaganda. It concealed the fact that the state forcibly drove peasants into collective farms depriving from the citizens the right to own land as private property, limiting any initiative.

 History of the social and cultural complex of Ivano-Frankivsk region shows that in despite of major improvements in solving certain issues of life and well-being of people, the contradiction between reality and demands constantly increased. Soviet power could not achieve adequate time needs improvements - the standard of living of most citizens remained miserable. Although it should be noted that in the period under review increased the overall standard of living: increased production of consumer goods; was formed the Soviet model infrastructure of public services, were positive changes in solving the housing problem, development of education, health, culture, sports and so on. However absolutisation of national interests, the emphasis on them did not contribute to the solution of many pressing issues of social development and villages.

 In the study period the overall standard of living of the rural population has increased, was organized system of remuneration, improved pensions. You can definitely say that the standard of living of the villagers of Ivano-Frankivsk region significantly increased. Material and technical resources and manpower were concentrated, both in collective and state farms, and the enforcement plans for the introduction of housing, schools, kindergartens, hospitals, public utilities and service life in the countryside. In the second half of the twentieth century were positive upheavals in solving housing problems, development of education, health, culture, sports and so on. However, there were also laid great social contradictions - "problem of wasted villages." Problems of optimal level of consumption of goods, of mass consumption, deficit, lack of adequate infrastructure supply and demand, poor development of trade, low possibility of revenue through consumer goods gained its extreme limits of unresolved problems at the end of the 80 th years of XX century.

Author Biography

Roman Vеprіv, Ivano-Frankivsk Branch Institute of History of Ukraine, NAS of Ukraine

Applicant

References

Жулканич Н. М. Трансформація аграрних відносин в областях Українських Карпат (друга половина 60-х рр. ХХ - початок ХХІ ст.) / Н. М. Жулканич. - Ужгород : Карпати, 2008. - 408 с.

Кривчик Г. Г. Українське село під владою номенклатури (60-80 рр. ХХ ст.) / Г. Г. Кривчик. - Дніпропетровськ, 2001. - 192 с.

Лендєл М. А. Аграрне виробництво в Карпатському регіоні : сучасний стан, тенденції, перспективи розвитку / М. А. Лендєл. - Ужгород : Карпати, 2006. - 216 с.

Малярчук О. М. Тоталітаризм проти західноукраїнського села / О. М. Малярчук. - Івано-Франківськ : Місто НВ, 2008. - 228 с.

Падалка С. С. Українське село в контексті політики тоталітарної держави (60-80-ті роки ХХ ст.) / С. С. Падалка. - К., 2003. - 165 с.

Тимченко С. Українське село : Проблеми етносоціальних змін. 1959-1989 / С. Тимченко. - Запоріжжя : Запорізький держ. ун-т, 1995. - 529 с.

Державний архів Івано-Франківської області (далі - ДАІФО), ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 4331, 132 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 3903, 92 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 4221, 157 арк.

Центральний державний архів громадських об'єднань України (далі - ЦДАГО України), ф. 1, оп. 25, спр. 2572, 84 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. Р - 7, оп. 2, спр. 1618, 42 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 3825, 41 арк.

ЦДАГО України, ф. 1, оп. 25, спр. 2572, 84 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. Р - 295, оп. 5, спр. 3491, 6 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. Р - 295, оп. 5, спр. 3777, 29 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. Р - 295, оп. 5, спр. 3654, 40 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 4118, 220 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 5002, 227 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 5105, 97 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 5129, 26 арк.

ЦДАГО України, ф. 1, оп. 25, спр. 2572, 84 арк.

Там само, арк. 74.

Там само, арк. 68-69.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 3683, 230 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. Р - 295, оп. 5, спр. 3885, 175 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 4443, 145 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 3814, 100 арк.

ЦДАГО України, ф. 1, оп. 25, спр. 2572, 84 арк.

ДАІФО, ф. П - 1, оп. 1, спр. 3723, 125 арк.

ЦДАГО України, ф. 1, оп. 25, спр. 2109, 78 арк.

ЦДАГО України, ф. 1, оп. 25, спр. 3352, 121 арк.

Zhulkanych N. M. (2008), Transformation of the agricultural relationship in Ukrainian Carpathian regions (second part of the 60th XX - beginning XXI century), Karpaty, Uzhhorod, 408 p. (ukr).

Kryvchyk H. H. (2001), Ukrainian village under nomenclature pressure (60 - 80 years XX century), Dnipropetrovsk, 192 p. (ukr).

Lendiel M. A. (2006), Agricultural production in Carpathian region : modern situation, perspectives of development, Karpaty, Uzhhorod, 216 p. (ukr).

Maliarchuk O. M. (2008), Totalitarity against west Ukrainian village, Ivano-Frankivsk, 228 p. (ukr).

Padalka S. S. (2003), Ukrainian village in the context of totalitarian politick of the country (60 - 80th years of XXth century), Kyiv, 165 р. (ukr).

Tymchenko S. (1995), Ukrainian village : Problems of ethnic and social changes. 1959-1989, Zaporizhzhia, 529 p. (ukr).

State archive of Ivano-Frankivsk region (next - SAOIFR), fond Р 1, opys 1, sprava 4331, 132 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 3903, 92 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 4221, 157 р.

Central state archive of Ukrainian government (next - CSAOUG), fond 1, opys 25, sprava 2572, 84 р.

SAOIFR, fond R - 7, opys 2, sprava 1618, 42 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 3825, 41 р.

CSAOUG, fond 1, opys 25, sprava 2572, 84 р.

SAOIFR, fond R - 295, opys 5, sprava 3491, 6 р.

SAOIFR, fond R - 295, opys 5, sprava 3777, 29 р.

SAOIFR, fond R - 295, opys 5, sprava 3654, 40 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 4118, 220 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 5002, 227 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 5105, 97 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 5129, 26 р.

CSAOUG, fond 1, opys 25, sprava 2572, 84 р.

The same, р. 74.

The same, рр. 68-69.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 3683, 230 р.

SAOIFR, fond R - 295, opys 5, sprava 3885, 175 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 4443, 145 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 3814, 100 р.

CSAOUG, fond 1, opys 25, sprava 2572, 84 р.

SAOIFR, fond Р - 1, opys 1, sprava 3723, 125 р.

CSAOUG, fond 1, opys 25, sprava 2109, 78 р.

CSAOUG, fond 1, opys 25, sprava 3352, 121 р.

Published

2013-07-11

How to Cite

Vеprіv R. (2013). Social and cultural complex of Рrykarpattya village in the second half the XX century. Skhid, (3(123), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2013.3(123).15222

Issue

Section

History