DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2018.5(157).148633

Understanding intentionality structure: development of hermeneutics F. Brentano

Vira Dubinina

Abstract


The author of research points out at philosophical heritage of F. Brentano, famous Austrian philosopher and psychologist considered to be founder of phenomenology. In particular, philosophy of language and theory of intentionality are regarded in connection with development of hermeneutic ideas in the context of phenomenological school.

The interaction between this concept and representatives of different linguistic theories of the end of XIX century – the early XX century is shown. The concept of intentionality is presented as key element of process of understanding and interpretation, as criterion of differentiation of mental and physical phenomena, as theoretical and cognitive principle that expresses an orientation to, on the one hand, objective sense of phenomena, and, on the other hand, intention of subject-interpreter.

Intentionality becomes fundamental structure of mind that lies deeper than any concrete, local mental state. From the point of view of Brentano, any psychic act is directed at something, what makes it intentional. Such position had a great influence on development of ideas of modern hermeneutics.

One more vector of development of hermeneutic problematic is described. This vector connects hermeneutic problematic with couple of the most important theories of given period and directly leads to appearance of E. Husserl’s phenomenology that is an origin of modern hermeneutics. Intentionality is examined as initial model that makes sense of hermeneutic interpretation.

Understanding, which is injected in hermeneutic as a basic target, is an isomorphic structure to intentionality. Intentional object with its nature, indifferent to valid existence of a thing, becomes the most important feature of mind and major element of hermeneutic discourse.

Keywords


intentionality; hermeneutic; understanding; interpretation; language; internal form of the word; model; sens

References


Badikov, E.F. 1996. Reinterpretation of subjectivity in the European philosophy of the twentieth century. Scientific notes of the Kazan University. Humanities series. Vol. 134. Book. 3. Kazan University Press, Kazan: 120-128 (rus).

Brentano, F. 1874. Psychologie vom emprisischen Standpunkte, Bd. 1. Verlag von Duncker & Humblot. Leipzig, 1874, 350 s. Available at: https://archive.org/details/psychologievome02brengoog/page/n4.

Brentano, F. 1996. Selected Works. [comp., translat. V. Anashvili]. Dom intellektualnoy knigi, Russian Phenomenological Society, Moscow. 176 p. (rus).

Gromov, R.A. 2004. Anton Marty. The philosophy of the Brentanov school language. Logos, № 1. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/logos/2004/1/gr7-pr.html.

Humboldt, W. von. 1985. The nature of the language and the nature of the people [translat]. Language and philosophy of culture. Progress, Moscow: 370-381 (rus).

Husserl, E. 1999. Ideas for pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy [translat.]. Dom intellektualnoy knigi, 336 p. (rus)

Karpenko, I.V. 2005. Intentionality of consciousness and genre diversity of philosophy. Humanitarnyi Chasopys. No. 3: 5-10 (rus).

Kraus, O. 1919. Franz Brentano - zur Kenntnis seines Lebens und seiner Lehre. C.H. Beck, München, 171 s. Available at: https://archive.org/stream/franzbrentanozur00krauuoft/franzbrentanozur00krauuoft_djvu.txt

Martynov, K.K. 2007. Intentionality and scientific naturalism. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7: Philosophy. № 2: 20-38 (rus).

Meinong, А. [ed.] 1904. Über Gegenstaudstheorie. Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Leipzig, 1904, S. 1-51. Available at: http://www.gleichsatz.de/b-u-t/gene/meinong/standtheorie1.html

Nikonenko, Sergei 2017. Intentionality: an American point of view. HORIZON. 2017. №1 (11). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/intentsionalnost-amerikanskaya-tochka-zreniya (дата звернення: 22.09.2018).

Perler, D. 2016. Theory of Intentionality in the Middle Ages [translat.]. Delo, Moscow, 472 pp. (rus).


GOST Style Citations


Бадиков Э. Ф. Реинтерпретация субъективности в европейской философии ХХ века. Ученые записки Казанского университета. Серия Гуманитарные науки. T. 134. Кн. 3. Казань: Изд-во Казанского ун-та, 1996. С. 120-128.

 

Брентано Ф. Избранные работы / сост., перев. с нем. В. Анашвили. Москва: Дом интеллектуальной книги, Русское феноменологическое общество, 1996. 176 с.

 

Громов Р. А. Антон Марти. Философия языка брентановской школы. Логос, 2004. № 1.

 

Гумбольдт В. фон. Характер языка и характер народа / Язык и философия культуры. Москва: Прогресс, 1985. С. 370-381.

 

Гуссерль Э. Идеи к чистой феноменологии и феноменологической философии. Москва: Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999. 336 с.

 

Карпенко И. В. Интенциональность сознания и жанровое многообразие философии. Гуманітарний часопис. 2005. № 3. С. 5-10.

 

Мартынов К. К. Интенциональность и научный натурализм. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7: Философия. 2007. № 2. С. 20-38.

 

Никоненко С. В. Интенциональность: американская точка зрения. HORIZON. Феноменологические исследования. 2017. № 1 (11). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/intentsionalnost-amerikanskaya-tochka-zreniya (дата звернення: 22.09.2018).

 

Перлер Д. Теории интенциональности в средние века. Москва: Дело, 2016. 472 с.

 

Brentano F. Psychologie vom emprisischen Standpunkte, Bd. 1. Verlag von Duncker & Humblot. Leipzig, 1874. 350 s.

 

Kraus O. Franz Brentano - zur Kenntnis seines Lebens und seiner Lehre. C. H. Beck, München, 1919. 171 s.

 

Meinong А. [ed.] Über Gegenstaudstheorie. Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Leipzig, 1904. S. 1-51.