DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2018.3(155).139675

Basic approaches to the definition of the concept of "videogame" as an element of modern scientific discourse

Olexandr Horban, Maria Maletska

Abstract


The article explores the concept of "videogame" as a narrative of modern social and philosophical thought, which considers a video game through the prism of the gaming of social and individual life of a person. It is emphasized that despite the active penetration of videogames into the life of a person, a general concept of a "videogame" has not yet been formed in scientific discourse that would comprehensively cover this phenomenon, reflect its specific features and determine the further directions of research. It is proposed to supplement the concept of "videogames" with the following characteristics: 1) Videogame becomes new cultural phenomenon, one of parts of the mass culture and art of the modern world; 2) Videogame forms not only a virtual world, virtual space. Nearby the virtual space of game forms special society, also in this space can be formed special culture, ethic and morality that modifies real standards; 3) Videogame may be merely game for fun; however, it also can bring some ideas: philosophical, political etc.; 4) Interactive in videogames depends on a genre or platform of the game. "Videogame" concept should include not only indication of interactive, but also capability of levels and variety of interaction between game and player; 5) "Videogame" concept should describe videogame as complex phenomenon that have positive and negative aspects. Emphasizing on one side may reduce concept. It is concluded that the video game will become a new cultural phenomenon, part of the mass and artistic culture of the twentieth century. The expansion of the currently available concept "videogame" can bring closer the formation of a stable scientific concept, which will become the foundation for the development of a scientific discourse on the study of gaming as a general theory of videogames.

Keywords


game; videogame; concept; discourse; "homo ludens"; gaming; gamology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Djaouti D., Alvarez J., Jessel J-P. 2008. Agameplay definition through videogame classification. Hindawi Publishing Corp., 4:1-4:7.

Egenfeldt-Nielsen S., Smith J.H., Tosca S.P. 2008. Under­standing Video Games: The Essential Introduction. Routledge, New-York andLondon: 293 p.

Esposito N. 2005. AShort and Simple Definition of What a Video Game Is. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 (Changing Views: Worlds in Play).Vancouver (Canada), 16-20 juin.

Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R.C. 2014. The benefits of playing video games. The American psychologist, 69/1. Р. 66-78.

Horban O., Martych R. 2017. Basic approaches to the definition of the essence of the concept of «living». Studia War­minskie. №54: 93-103.

Sicart, M. 2009. The Ethics of Computer Games. MA: MIT Press,Cambridge. 264 p.

Alieva, Olga; Zhukova, Marina. 2016. Virtual games as culture phenomenon of modern. Skhid, n. 5(145): 64-67. DOI: 10.21847/1728-9343.2016.5(145).83810.

Gupalovska, V. 2012. Adictation as a form of dependent behavior: the problem of definition. Bulletin of the Kiev National University. Taras Shevchenko. Psychology. Pedagogy. Social work. No. 4: P. 6-10 (ukr).

Dodonov, R. 2014. To the ontological status of information. Bulletin of Donetsk National University Series B: The Humanities. No. 1-2: 411-418.

Ilnytska, L. A. 2011. Ways of psychological support of persons dependent on the Internet in the juvenile age. Science and Education: Sciences. Prekt. journ south of sciences Center NAPN Ukraine. No. 11 (Psychology): 57-61 (ukr).

Kislyuk, K. 2014. Perspectives of computer games in the media culture of the XXI century. Culture of Ukraine. 2014. Vol. 47: P. 40-48.

Koblevsky, A.V., Khovrich M.O. 2016. Computer games and programs as a means of educational process in a secondary school. Bulletin of the Chernihiv National Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogical Sciences. Issue 137: 230-233.

Nosov, N.A. 2000. Dictionary of virtual terms. Proceedings of the Laboratory of Virtualistics. Vol. 7. Proceedings of the Center for career guidance.Moscow: «The Way», 2000. 69 p.

Stepanov, V. V. 2013. Computer games as a subject of ethics and ethical systems as an in-game element. Young Scientist. № 11: 857-861. Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/58/8011/.

Stratonova, N. 2014. Self-identification of the person in the virtual space of the game. Scientific Bulletin of the East Euro­pean National University named after. Lesia Ukrainka: Philoso­phical Sciences (Lutsk) № 16 (293): 37-43.

Fedorov, A.V. and Charcot, V.D. 2011. Computer game «First Million» as an element of the learning environment «Atomic Physics». Information technology in education. Vol. 10: 34-40.

Huizinga, J. 1997. Homo Ludens; Articles on the history of culture [translat.] Progress - Tradition,Moscow, 416 p.


GOST Style Citations


1. Djaouti D., Alvarez J., Jessel J-P., Methel G., Molinier P. A gameplay definition through videogame classification. Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. Hindawi Publishing Corp., 2008. Т. 2008. С. 4:1-4:7.

 

2. Egenfeldt-Nielsen S., Smith J.H., Tosca S.P. Understanding Video Games: The Essential Introduction. New-York andLondon: Routledge, 2008. 293 p.

 

3. Esposito N. A Short and Simple Definition of What a Video Game Is / Nicolas Esposito. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 (Changing Views: Worlds in Play).Vancouver (Canada), 16-20 juin.

 

4. GranicI., Lobel A. & Engels R.C. The benefits of playing video games. The American psychologist, 2014, 69/1. Р. 66-78.

 

5. Horban O., Martych R. Basic approaches to the definition of the essence of the concept of «living». Studia Warminskie. 2017. 54. p. 93-103.

 

6. Sicart M. The Ethics of Computer Games.Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 2009. 264 p.

 

7. Алієва О., Жукова М. Віртуальні ігри як феномен сучасної культури. Схід. 2016. № 5. С. 64-67. DOI: 10.21847/1728-9343.2016.5(145).83810.

 

8. Гупаловська В. Адикція як форма залежної поведінки : проблема визначення. Вісник Київського національного університету ім. Тараса Шевченка. Психологія. Педагогіка. Соціальна робота. Київ: КНУ ім. Тараса Шевченка, 2012. № 4. С. 6-10.

 

9. Dodonov R. To the ontological status of information. Bulletin of Donetsk National University Series B: The Humanities. 2014. No. 1-2, 411-418.

 

10. Ільницька Л. А. Шляхи здійснення психологічного супроводу осіб, залежних від інтернету, в юнацькому віці. Наука і освіта: наук.-практ. журн. півд. наук. центру НАПН України. 2011. № 11 (Психологія). С. 57-61.

 

11. Кислюк К. Перспективи комп’ютерних ігор у медіа-культурі ХХІ ст. Культура України. 2014. Вип. 47. С. 40-48.

 

12. Коблевський А., Ховрич М. Комп’ютерні ігри та програми як засіб навчально-виховного процесу у загальноосвітній школі. Вісник Чернігівського національного педагогічного університету. Серія: Педагогічні науки. 2016. Вип. 137. С. 230-233.

 

13. Носов Н. А. Словарь виртуальных терминов. Труды лаборатории виртуалистики. Вып. 7. Труды Центра профориентации. Москва: Путь, 2000. 69 с.

 

14. Степанов В. В. Компьютерные игры как предмет этики и этические системы как внутриигровой элемент. Молодой ученый. 2013. №11. С. 857-861. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/58/8011/.

 

15. Стратонова Н. Самоідентифікація особистості у віртуальному просторі гри. Науковий вісник Східноєвропейського національного університету ім. Лесі Українки: Філософські науки. Луцьк: Східноєвроп. нац. ун-т ім. Лесі Українки, 2014. № 16 (293). С. 37-43.

 

16. Федоров А. В., Шарко В. Д. Комп’ютерна гра «Перший мільйон» як елемент навчального середовища «Атомна фізика». Інформаційні технології в освіті. 2011. Вип. 10. С. 34-40.

 

17. Хёйзинга Й. Homo Ludens; Статьи по истории культуры / пер., сост. и вступ. ст. Д. В. Сильвестрова; коммент. Д. Э. Харитоновича. Москва: Прогресс-Традиция, 1997. 416 с.






Copyright (c) 2018 Olexandr Horban, Maria Maletska

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN 1728-9343 (Print)

ISSN 2411-3093 (Online)