The philosophical issues of the idea of conscious machines


  • Konstantin Rayhert Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine



artificial consciousness, artificial intelligence, cognitive robotics, conscious machine, cyborg


The study outlines the existing and potential philosophical issues of the idea of conscious machines originated from the development of artificial consciousness within the framework of contemporary research of artificial intelligence and cognitive robotics. The outline shows that the idea of conscious machines is concerned with two big philosophical issues. The first philosophical issue is a definition of consciousness, taking into account the selection of a set of objects that can have consciousness (human being, living being or machine), the typology of consciousness, the clarifying of the nature of consciousness' carriers and the relationship between consciousness and its environment (including social and cultural) and the relationship between consciousness and language, in order to create an artificial consciousness within a machine, making that machine conscious. The second philosophical issue is a clarification whether only artificially created machines can be conscious machines, or cyborgizated (engineered) human beings also can be considered of conscious machines. These philosophical issues show that there can be two ways to create conscious machines: 1) the creating of artificial consciousness within artificially created machine; and 2) the cyborgization of human being, transforming it into artificially created machine possessed natural consciousness (or even possessed consciousness artificially transformed from natural into artificial).

Author Biography

Konstantin Rayhert, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Candidate of philosophical sciences, associate professor of the Department of philosophy and methodology of knowledge


Rayhert, K. W. (2016). The Theoretic Loading of the Conceptual Metaphor of Logical Language. Filosofiia i politologiia v konteksti suchasnoyi kultury, №2 (11), pp. 144-150 (ukr).

Aleksander, I. (1995). Artificial Neuroconsciousness: An Update, available at: DOI: 10.1007/3-540-59497-3_224.

Block, N. (1997). On a Confusion about a Function of Cons­ciousness, in Block N., Flanagan O. and Guzeldere G. (Eds.), The Nature of Consciousness. Philosophical Debates. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 375-416.

Boyles, R. J. (2012). Artificial Qualia, Intentional Systems and Machine Consciousness, available at:

Buttazzo, G. (2011). Artificial Consciousness: Utopia or Real Possibility? Computer, №7, pp. 24-30. DOI: 10.1109/2.933500.

Chalmers, D. J. (2011). A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, №4, pp. 325-359. DOI: 10.17791/jcs.2011.12.4.325.

Chalmers, D. J. (2010). Facing Up to the Problem of Cons­ciousness. Chalmers, D. J. (2010). The Character of Conscio­usness. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-27. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311105.003.0001.

Dehaene, S., Lau, H. & Kouider, S. (2017). What is Consciousness, and Could Machines Have It? Science, №6362, pp. 486-492. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan8871.

Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

Gamez, D. (2008). Progress in Machine Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, №3, pp. 887-910. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.005.

Haikonen, P. O. (2003). Cognitive Approach to Conscious Machines. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

Haikonen, P. O. (2007). Robot Brains: Circuits and Sys­tems for Conscious Machines. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.

Haladjian, H. H. (2016). Consciousness and Language. Psychology Today, available at:

Harnad, S. (2000). Correlation vs. Causality: How/Why the Mind/Body Problem is hard. Journal of Consciousness Studies, №4, pp. 54-61.

La Mettrie, J. O., de (1865). L'homme machine. Paris: Frederic Henry.

Locke, J. (1999). An Essay Concerning Human Under­standing. New York: Oxford University Press USA.

Lycan, W. (1996). Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Markoff, J. (2016). Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground between Humans and Robots. New York: Ecco.

Neukart, F. (2016). Reverse Engineering the Mind: Cons­ciously Acting Machines and Accelerated Evolution. Berlin: Sprin­ger. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-16176-7.

Pitrat, J. (2009). Artificial Beings: the Conscience of a Conscious Machine. Hoboken: Wiley-ISTE.

Reggia, J. A. (2014). Conscious Machines: The AI Pers­pective, available at:

Reggia, J. A. (2013). The Rise of Machine Consciousness: Studying Consciousness with Computational Models. Neural Network, vol. 44, pp. 112-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.03.011.

Sassoon, L. '(2017). 'Robot Intelligence is Dangerous': Expert's Warning after Facebook AI 'Develop Their Own Lan­guage'. Mirror, available at:

Schlagel, R. H. (1999). Why not Artificial Consciousness or Thought? Minds and Machines, №1, pp. 3-28. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008374714117.

Velmans, M. (2009). How to Define Consciousness - and How not to Define Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, №5, pp. 139-156.




How to Cite

Rayhert, K. (2018). The philosophical issues of the idea of conscious machines. Skhid, (6(152), 108–111.