DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2016.2(142).103341

Language as autopoiesis element of social construction

Oleg Kirnitіkiy

Abstract


The article explores the constructivist contexts of the phenomenon of language. In the study, the author focuses on the autopoiesis and virtual nature of the language within the social. Particular attention is paid to the role of language in the social constructivist mechanisms of creating the social reality of the societies of the twenty-first century. The paper examines the possibilities of the language in changing the configurations of social life.

Social reality in all its complexity appears as a construct is created as interferences between some weight, the critical volume of a variety of social structures and a distinct virtual "fingerprint" - language. Therefore, it appears, exposing its metaphorical reduction, some "optics" that allows you to see the social world around us.

To understand the social world through language as possible transcendental region that mediates any social cognition. It optics, allowing you to see the object of knowledge required for the researcher "angle of view". Thus, the article language vision of the role gradually out of linguistic vision frames only. Check out the traditional understanding of the language sets the analytic philosophy that sees it as a design autopoiezis element social interactions and not as aloof and independent system of values. At the same time it acts as a medium so that constructs a social world through social researchers very difficult to investigate a separate phenomenon of "a self-continue", taken separately, out of context, executes all social structures into a single space semiotic meanings.

Autopoiesis concept of language as an element of social construction is an important part of our research strategy. Autopoiesis characteristics of speech lies in the fact that it provided service property that affects the semantic field of social and has a range of eigenvalues. Treatment language as autopoiesis component analysis of its involvement in a network of social and structural processes makes great material for a meaningful understanding of the mechanisms of virtual social construction. Typical properties of language as a social construction autopoiesis component should include continuous self-development and self-renewal. In an increasingly virtualized world, these social characteristics are fundamental.

Keywords


language; reproduction; virtual; social construction; social reality; autopoesis

References


Saussure, F. (1990), Notes on general linguistics [translat.], Progress Publishing, Moscow, 280 p. (rus).

Maturana, U. & Varela, F. (2001), The Tree of Knowledge, The Tree of Knowledge Publishing, Moscow, 224 p. (rus).

Humboldt, V. (2000), Selected Works on Linguistics, Progress Publishing, Moscow, 400 p. (rus).

Sapir, E. (2000), An Introduction to the Study of Speech, Dover Publications, New York, 204 p. (eng).

Searle, J. R. (1970), Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 203 p. (eng).

Weissenberg, L. (2004), Mother tongue and spirit formation [translat.] URSS Editorial, Moscow, 232 p. (rus).

Humboldt, W. (1984), On Thinking and Speaking, in: Selected works on linguistics [translat.], Progress Publishing, Moscow, pp. 301-302 (rus).

Gurevich, A. Ya. (1993), Historical synthesis and school "Annals", Indrik Publishing, Moscow, 328 p. (rus).

Lotman, Yu. (2000), The Semiosphere: Culture and Explosion Inside the Thinking Worlds, Art - St. Petersburg Publishing, St. Petersburg, 704 p. (rus).

Foucault, M. (1994), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences [translat.], A-cad Publishing, St. Petersburg, 408 p. (rus).

Stubb, Elsina (2002), Wilhelm Von Humboldt's Philosophy of Language, Its Sources and Influence, Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, N.Y., 332 p. (Studies in Linguistics and Semiotics, V. 9).

Heidegger, M. (1991), Language [translat.], Eidos Publishing, Moscow, 22 p. (rus).


GOST Style Citations


1. Соссюр Ф. Заметки по общей лингвистике / Ф. Соссюр. – М. : Прогресс, 1990. – 280 с.

 

2. Матурана У. Древо познания / У. Матурана, Ф. Варела. – М. : Древо познания, 2001. – 224 с.

 

3. Гумбольдт В. Избранные труды по языкознанию / В. фон Гумбольдт. – М. : Прогресс, 2000. – 400 с.

 

4. Sapir E. An Introduction to the Study of Speech / E. Sapir. – New York : Dover Publications, 2000. – 204 p.

 

5. Searle J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language / J. R. Searle. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1970. – 203 p.

 

6. Вайсенберг Л. Родной язык и формирование духа / Л. Вайсенберг. – М. : УРСС Эдиториал, 2004. – 232 с.

 

7. Гумбольдт В. О мышлении и речи // Гумбольдт В. Избранные труды по языкознанию / В. фон Гумбольдт. – М. : Прогресс, 1984. – С. 301–302.

 

8. Гуревич А. Я. Исторический синтез и школа «Анналов» / А. Я. Гуревич. – М. : Индрик, 1993. – 328 с.

 

9. Лотман Ю. Семиосфера: Культура и взрыв Внутри мыслящих миров / Ю. Лотман. – СПб. : Искусство – СПб, 2000. – 704 с.

 

10. Фуко М. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук / М. Фуко. – СПб. : А-cad, 1994. – 408 с.

 

11. Stubb E. Wilhelm Von Humboldt's Philosophy of Language, Its Sources and Influence / Elsina Stubb. –Lewiston, N.Y. : Edwin Mellen Press, 2002. – 332 p. – (Studies in Linguistics and Semiotics, V. 9).

 

12. Хайдеггер М. Язык / М. Хайдеггер. – М. : Эйдос, 1991. – 22 с.







ISSN 1728-9343 (Print)

ISSN 2411-3093 (Online)