The notion of semiotics constructs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2015.6(138).53102

Keywords:

semiotic constructs, semiosis, social reality, life-world

Abstract

The article discovers different approaches of semiotic constructs definition in the context of its structural and functional features at different levels of being. With regard to those definitions author analyzed the meaning of this concept and found the affinities with the concepts of "encyclopedia" (U.Eco), sedimentation and the tezaurus approach, as well as with aspects of logonomic systems (R.Hodge and G.Kress). The experienced meaning in the semiotic constructs are thematically grouped around a certain sense. It is shown that semiotic constructs has multiple connotations that can influence the interpretation of the subsequent semiotic theories in different contexts. Author believes that communication has constructive sense, because its literally builds today the value of future. Thus the expanded and narrowed understanding of the semiotic constructs is proposed. On the basis of S. Langer's semiotics approach author proposes the consideration of extended comprehension of semiotic constructs through the discursive and representative levels. Therefore, the multimodal nature of semiotic design of social world is pointed out. The life world peculiarities of the sign-symbolic constructions, particularly in the context of the civil society and the social roles are determined. In the consequences author remarks the danger of the human life world colonization, especially in the modern Ukraine.

Author Biography

Volodymyr Konoval, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

postgraduate

References

Bart R. (2008), Basics of Semiology, in: Zero Degree of Writing, Academic project, Moscow, pp. 275-373. (rus).

Berger P., Lukman T. (1995), The Social Construction of Reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge, Medium, Moscow, 323 p. (rus).

Golovenko R. What and why is the dekomunіzation of publіc space, available at: http://www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2015/08/21/7078532/ (ukr).

Deely J.(2000), Basics of semіotics, Arsenal, Kyiv, 232 p. (ukr).

Karas A.(2006), Civil society and Ukraine: The search of discursive context of authentity and freedom, Collection of Science articles, PC Іvan Franko LNU, 2006, p. 5-34 (ukr).

Karas A. (2006), Reality and philosophy: an attempt of semiotic approach, in: Philosophy of science. Collected articles of Lviv-Warsaw seminar «Philosophy of Science», Lviv, pp. 98-113 (ukr).

Karas A. (2008), Semiotic perspective of interpretation of reality as actuality, Philosophical thought, Vol. 5, pp. 16-29 (ukr).

Kіs R. (2002), Language, Thought and culture reality (from Oleksandr Potebnya to cultural relativity theory), Lіtopys, Lviv, 303 p. (ukr).

Konoval V. (2014), Semіosis in the formation of lifeworld, Skhid, № 2 (128), pp. 150-153 (ukr).

Konoval V. (2013), Sign and symbol in S. Langer’s semiotics, Visnyk of Lviv Unіversity. Series philosophical science, Issue 16, Lviv, pp. 106-113 (ukr).

Lotman Y. (1992), About semiosphere, Articles on semiotics and cultural typology, Alexander, Tallinn, pp. 11-25 (rus).

Lotman Y. (2000), Culture and explosion in: Semiosphere, Arts, St. Petersburg, pp. 12-149 (rus).

Lukov V. A. (2004), Thesaurus approach in the humanities, Knowledge. Understanding. Ability, Moscow, Vol. 1, pp. 93-100 (rus).

Lukyanova N. A. (2010), From the sign to the semiotic constructs of communicative space, Publishing house of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, 245 p. (rus).

Petrenko E. L. (2003), Habermas reflects on modern, in: Habermas J. Philosophical Discourse of modernity, Publishing House «Ves Mir», Moscow, pp. 401-416 (rus).

Pocheptsov G. New meanings that «breakes» countries, available at: http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/trends/1411978127/novye_smysly_lomayuschie_strany/ (rus).

Chandler D. (2007), Semiotics: the basics, Routledge, New York, 307 p. (engl). doi: 10.4324/9780203014936

Eco U. (1986), Semiotics and the philosophy of language, Indianauniversity press, Bloomington, 242 p. (engl).

Hodge R., Kress G. (1988), Social semiotics, Polity Press, Cambridge, 287 p. (engl).

Tarasti Eero (2000), Existential Semiotics, Indiana university press, Bloomington, 218 p. (engl).

Published

2015-11-26

How to Cite

Konoval, V. (2015). The notion of semiotics constructs. Skhid, (6(138), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2015.6(138).53102