Phenomenology of religion as vіa medіa: on potentialities of the phenomenological approach to integration of philosophy of religion and theology

Authors

  • Mykhailo Cherenkov Philosophical Education and Science Institute of M. P. Dragomanov National Teacher Training University; Ukrainian Catholic University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5683-7975

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2015.4(136).48402

Keywords:

phenomenology, philosophy of religion, theology, Christianity, metaphysics

Abstract

The paper deals with relations between philosophy of religion, theology and phenomenology within the changeable structure of scientific knowledge.

It is religion itself as religious life in its immediacy and almost physical reality (without any unnecessary 'super' structures) rather than philosophical or theological knowledge as knowledge of religion, which becomes the subject matter of phenomenology. With this immediacy (the non-metaphysic and non-theoretical nature), potentialities of the scientific phenomenological approach are preserved because life does not remain indifferent to questions of the subject who cognizes and is open to reflexion, questions, doubts and research.

Phenomenology is regarded as via media, tsar's way, which combines potentialities of philosophy of religion and Christian theology. Philosophy of religion remains external and neutral to the processes, Christian theology being internal and involved in the latter. Phenomenology is used to make Christian theology at least partially accessible for philosophy of religion. In this way the role of phenomenology is intermediary and integrative. In propinquity to philosophy of religion and theology, phenomenology which serves both and enriches itself through both can be reasonably called 'vіa medіa'.

Author Biography

Mykhailo Cherenkov, Philosophical Education and Science Institute of M. P. Dragomanov National Teacher Training University; Ukrainian Catholic University

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor of the Cultural Studies Department 

References

Shokhin V. K. (2011), Philosophy of Religion. Almanac 2010-2011, Vostochnaya lyteratura, Moscow, p. 15-31 (rus).

Pylayev M. (2012), Filosofska dumka. Sententiae. Special Issue II, 2011. Theology and Philosophy of Religion, p. 188-202 (rus).

Dobko T. (2012), «God phenomenologists» answer to the dilemma as «the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob» or «God of the philosophers and scientists», in Philosophy of Religion, р. 133-140 (ukr).

Chernomorets Yu. (2012), Theology as a science, Russkiy zhurnal. 26.07.2012, available at: http://www.russ.ru/layout/set/print/Mirovaya-povestka/Teologiya-kak-nauka-2 (rus).

Milbank D. (2012), Filosofska dumka. Sententiae. Special Issue III, 2013. Theology and Philosophy of Religion, p. 108-120 (rus).

Balthasar Hans Urs von (2013), Theo-Logic : Volume I: The Truth of the World, Izdatelstvo BBY, Moscow, 301 p. (rus).

Smith J. (2012), Church and post-modernism (translated), Kollokvium, Cherkassy, 214 p. (rus).

Smith C. (2011), The Bible made impossible. Why biblicism is not a truly evangelical reading of Scripture, BrazosPress, Grand Rapids, 220 p. (engl).

Hoffman H. (2012), Philosophy of Religion in Ukraine. Collected Works, Kyiv, p. 28-35 (ukr).

Chernomorets Yu. (2011), Forum 20. Twenty years of religious freedom and an active mission in the post-Soviet countries. Materials for discussion, Kyiv, p. 352-371 (rus).

Published

2015-08-22

How to Cite

Cherenkov, M. (2015). Phenomenology of religion as vіa medіa: on potentialities of the phenomenological approach to integration of philosophy of religion and theology. Skhid, (4(136), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2015.4(136).48402