Reception of medieval anthropology in "Trenos" Meletius Smotrytsky
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2014.5(131).27225Keywords:
human body, Eucharist, patristic anthropology, faith, sinAbstract
This article provides a detailed analysis of anthropological views of M. Smotrytsky that were outlined in his polemical essay "Trenos". We have analyzed a philosophical treatise of the work to identify a belonging of Ukrainian thinker to the medieval philosophical discourse. We also demonstrated novelty of M. Smotrytsky views against the backdrop of Ukrainian philosophical thought of XVII century. The main focus of the article is made upon the reception of medieval philosophical theories about the origin of life and the human body, which made M. Smotrytsky. In this article we provided a detailed analysis of all presentation logic understanding of the phenomenon of the human body presented by Ukrainian philosopher.
References
Holyk R. (2010), Body, soul and divided world: Stereotypes in Early Baroque works Meletiya Smotrytskoho ta Kyryla Trankviliona Stavrovetskoho, At the root of Ukrainian Baroque, Collection of scientific papers, Lviv, pp. 134-163 (ukr).
Grigory Nissky (1995), On the dispensation of Human, Translation, afterword and notes V. M. Lur'e, St. Petersburg, 176 p. (rus).
Gurevich P. S. (1999), Phylosophy of the man, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Moscow, 218 p. (rus).
Kvasiuk L. (2010), Polemic about Kvasniy bread and unleavened bread in the dogmatic part of the "Trenos" (1610) Meletiya Smotrytskoho, Ukrainian Studies, № 1, pp. 157-159 (ukr).
Monchak I. (2012), Florence ecumenism in Kiev Church: Uniate idea to ecclesial tradition, translation from English, Ukrainian Catholic University, Lviv, 364 p. (ukr).
Migne J. P. (1844-1864), About the Trinity X, 11, Patrologiae Cursus Completus, Series Latin, Paris, 982 p. (lat).
Turilov A. A., Fomina M. S. (2010), Word of St. John Chrysostom, "O holy Trinity and the creature, and the judgment of God", Ancient Rus, questions of the medieval studies, № 2, pp. 110-118 (rus).
Denzinger H. (ed.), The decision of the two natures of Christ Chalcedon, Enchiridion symbolorum et definitionum, quae in rebus fidei et morum a conciliis oecumenicis et summis pontificibus emanarunt, Vol. 31, № 148.
Frick D. (1987), Collekted Works of Meletij Smotryc'kyj, Harvard Library of Early Ukrainian Literature, Vol. I, CambridgeMass, 805 р. (engl).
Nassif B. (1991), Antiochene "theoria" in John Chrysostom's exegesis, Ph.D., Fordham University, 356 p. (engl).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Vitalii Shchepanskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
